Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Announcements and items of immediate importance.
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

The Man Who Mastered Gravity, Paul Schatzkin, 2023.

Amazon has it...
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0976200031/re ... d_swatch_0

What a hopeful title! If only...

Note: This is not a review of the entire book but first impressions from a man, myself, quite familiar with the work of T.T. Brown for which he is so acclaimed. I spent many years in electrostatics with hands-on experimenting at ESI's special built lab facilities with Charles Yost, reading assiduously, yet never saw one sign of what is termed "electrogravitics". I am now on chapter 13 yet am intrigued with what Paul has done. I have not arrived at the good stuff yet, but am close, and am still in free fall into the "rabbit hole", just about to land in wonderland, I am sure.

This is a great read for me in many ways. I was CEO of Electric Spacecraft Inc., 2005-2009 and was a friend the company's founder, Charles Yost, from 1990 until his death in March 2005. Charles created a trust into which I was inducted as CEO, and managing editor of its quarterly publication, The Electric Spacecraft Journal. Richmond to Asheville, N.C is over a 7 hour drive! A CEO at range for sure. As the corporate name states, Charles Yost spent a lot of money and time looking into "electrogravitics" as did Thomas Townsend Brown and others. A seemingly never ending quest with zero results, (direct link to fusion I think).

This book is the story of T.T. Brown told in a fashion mingled with fact and possible pseudo science, bizarre circumstance, intrigue and so much more. It is a tale woven by the Perfesser in a fashion whereby, using his own words, "Like Alice, I jumped down the rabbit hole". It is a must have for those who have followed 20th century scientific folks working at the "edge", (what ever that means). Such was a person like Tesla, Farnsworth, T.T. Brown and any number of others who got tangled up in their own and other people's under ware. This was mostly to their peril, but others were often affected as well. If these scientific investigators/inventors never got the acclaim they deserved, they certainly have a faithful train of followers regardless of any facts, fictions or inventions. Interested in diurnal petrovoltaic changes? Good ole T.T. investigated them! Few ever live the variegated life path of this man but just like Tesla, Farnworth, and T.T. Brown they died in relative obscurity.

Rabbit hole or not, th' Perfesser seems up to the task, much as a docent leading us into as much of the rabbit hole he has some knowledge of, having walked in the mysterious world through the looking glass, for even he admits, far too long.

My great joy is that he starts writing chapters of 3-4 pages each! Being a slow reader and falling asleep all too easy at 76, I really feel like I am getting somewhere at chapter 13 on page 76 of this well done appendixes and indexed tome of nearly 450 pages!

Jump down the rabbit hole with me. It's fun, creepy, mysterious, and a humorous look at an icon well known for his failed efforts, yet with a vast following. Check it out!

Richard Hull

P.S. What I believe...

1. The aliens have it! (if there are aliens)
2. We have it if we have any working alien craft (If Bob Lazar and some of the folks from S-4 are telling the truth).
3. If 1. and 2. above are true, I am not sure we can manufacture such craft for any number of reasons.
4. I do not believe for a microsecond that T.T. Brown had any original work by his own hand that touches on the operation of electrogravitics or related in any way to 1. or 2., if they are true.
5. I do believe the government (some agencies) are feeding us a line of B.S. (when a closed door session of the congressional oversight committee on UAPs is secret, you know this stuff is a national security matter.....And just how much B.S. are they feeding the committee in "secret session")

RH
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

As the above book deals with the major claim of Brown's life and the one that created the vast following of the man, (electrogravitics associated with the Biefield-Brown effect), I feel it necessary to examine the reality of physics and the basis of light and electromagnetism in the vacuum of space. We are talking about space travel after all, related to this effect!

I feel that space travel via the supposed "electrogravitic" method would involve some form of linkage between electromagnetism and gravity. (grand unified field theory). The latter theory is currently in never-never land of no hope. Currently in the battle related to gravity is the argument that it is just curved space! Yet, as of this moment, we see no curved space where there is no matter or a collapse of it. One can go nuts choosing between matter as the source of gravity or a displacement of space by matter causing matter within that space to fall inward towards the center of that neutrally charged matter. Notice I said neutrally charged matter.

The "electro" in electrogravitics is only there because of experiments related to the so-called electrogravitic effect (biefield-brown effect) demands that electrostatic force be induced between two conductive pieces of matter. This brings in electromagnetism to the theoretical concerns in electrogravitics.

All electromagnetism equations revolve around the observed fact that electromagnetic waves can move through space at the speed of light. The equations and all field theory force two values to exist to a specific value to define the speed of light within a vacuum. These are the permittivity of free space (~8.8 picofarads/meter) and the permeability of free space (1.25 uH/meter). Modern SI unit want to define both by the force laws based upon the newton meters per square ampere! This allows, in the minds-eye, the electromagnetic energy carried by light (electromagnetic waves) to have a viable force associated with it in its reactions with matter. (Look up permittivity and permeability if you dare to try and understand further).

The upshot is electrogravitics uses only applied electrical forces against the two key values in space that determine the velocity of light. As there are no currents constantly flowing in a purely capacitive system once the charge is established (assuming no leakage in a pure vacuum), only the permittivity of free space is involved and only forces between the two charged bodies are involved. (electrostatics). This is why, in a vacuum, the effect on the system understudy sees no relative motion to its background surroundings.

In air, the huge electrical stress seen to move the "Naudin lifter" of dissimilar sized electrodes is due to ion wind (charged molecules set in motion off the small wire electrode above the thin foil aluminum sheet below. I proved this violence of ion bombardment using aluminized mylar for the large lower sheet electrode in a lifter which I constructed at the Electric Spacecraft, Inc. lab in North Carolina in 2003. The molecular layer of aluminum was stripped of its aluminum by the violence of charged molecules streaming past it (ionic wind). photos below of the result. Naturally as the aluminum was stripped away the lower electrode lost its surface conductivity (capacitance) and the craft lost lift.

This was never seen with the solid aluminum foil based Naudin lifters used in all previous lifters shown of the internet. Thus, there is, indeed, an effect, on earth, in air, due solely to the ionic wind. (ions are created around the hair fine aerial wire and then accelerated downward at high velocity past the large aluminum electrode). This created a jet stream of moving air molecules, lifting the craft at a huge energy net loss needing a number of watts to lift a mass equal to a penny.

Click on images for enlarged view

Richard Hull
Attachments
Lifter.anno.jpg
Lifter2.anno.jpg
Lifter3.anno.jpg
Lifter4.anno.jpg
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Dennis P Brown
Posts: 3147
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 10:46 am
Real name: Dennis Brown

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Dennis P Brown »

Richard, excellent review of both the topic and book. Also, an outstanding effort showing this interesting (yet not anti-gravity) effect.

Needless to say, the puzzle of gravity is a scientific subject area near and dear to me (Through I have zero interest in anything to do with 'antigravity'. I accept Relativity as proven fact and in that, 'anti-gravity has no meaning since gravity isn't a force of attraction nor, for that matter, a force at all.)

I feel sorry for the person T.T. Brown - they did find a 'fun' effect but decided to dial it up to 'eleven' (well, more like thirteen ... ;) ) instead of looking at it from the obvious 'pedestrian' angle. Oh, well.

Certainly, Tesla also went to eleven a few times, but some of his work was fantastically insightful and even brilliant on rare occasions (and yes, he invented the first true radio) - and I mean that word 'brilliant' in both senses. Tesla showed us the way in a number of important electrical areas (and as such, he has a fundamental unit of measure named after him. That is an extraordinarily rare honor!)

Only partly tragic (towards the end of his life) but couldn't argue that for much of his life a very successful person - he reached great heights in both technology and in social influence (and if one is noted by the enemies they make, then Tesla certainly is up there with J.P. Morgan as an enemy - that was Tesla's worse mistake.)

Yet very importantly, Tesla maintained his morality unlike a certain other more famous and so-called, 'great' inventor.
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

I am up to page 110 in my reading and starting to get settled into the rabbit hole.

As there is only matter and space, yet fully detected and identified, matter warps space. We know this as fact. I am super interested in inertia another property of only matter. Inertia is a force battling any change in motion of ponderable matter. It resists this change with a real force until the energy driving the change in motion either goes away or is dissipated to zero. The universe is not happy and will not leave matter alone until it is all in a constant velocity relative to the rest of the firmament.

Warped space can accelerate or decelerate matter. In doing so, it always robs energy from the nearby mass that warps the space it enters. When we slingshot a craft around a planet, we use the warped space and the relative velocity of the larger body to accelerate the small craft. In doing so, we rob orbital motion, (Momentum/velocity) of the planet. (Its orbit decays) This follows Newton's laws. The energy of the planet in orbit and the velocity of the craft, both mutually resisted the operation here via each orb's inertia. The small spacecraft gained momentum while resisting this acceleration, thereby, robing the planet of some of its momentum (put the brakes on the planet's orbital velocity) The universe via inertia associated with matter did the energy exchange. The warping of space by both objects remains unchanged as their mass is unchanged.

As the craft speeds away from the planet the inherent mass based forces that drove the inertia based energy exchange disappears. We say they just exchanged energy of momentum, but inertia did the transference. The planet's inertia resisted the slow down and the craft resisted the acceleration.

It is only fair that I note modern physics doesn't consider Inertia as a force. Ever try and push a stalled car of the road?? Did it or did it not resist your force with a force of its own against you. Once you got it rolling in motion, little energy was required to keep it rolling. .... Unless you were stupid enough to try and push it up hill against the yearnings of the hole in space cause by the earth's mass that wants that car at the core of the earth.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Paul_Schatzkin
Site Admin
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 12:49 pm
Real name: aka The Perfesser
Contact:

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Paul_Schatzkin »

First, Thank you Richard for posting about the book. I have meant to do that myself but... I dunno, just haven't yet. Maybe it's better this way.

Moving along to Dennis' post here, this is the stuff that really baffles me...
Dennis P Brown wrote: Tue Apr 04, 2023 5:25 am the puzzle of gravity is a scientific subject area near and dear to me (Through I have zero interest in anything to do with 'antigravity'. I accept Relativity as proven fact and in that, 'anti-gravity has no meaning since gravity isn't a force of attraction nor, for that matter, a force at all.)
Umm....???

So, then... why... when I do even the most cursory search, does the Google keep telling me that "there are four fundamental forces (interactions):
what are the four fundamental forces

The four fundamental forces are:

Gravity
Electromagnetic force
Strong nuclear force
Weak nuclear force
Source (via ChatGPT4) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

So... help me out here. Gravity IS or IS NOT a 'force' in the universe?

Whether or not there is antigravity, or whether there is a connection btw gravity and electromagnetism... how do we even have that discussion if we can't agree whether or not gravity is a 'force' to begin with?

And if it's not a force... then please explain why I am sitting here and not flying? Something is holding my butt in this chair. How is that not a 'force'?
I feel sorry for the person T.T. Brown - they did find a 'fun' effect but decided to dial it up to 'eleven' (well, more like thirteen ... ;) ) instead of looking at it from the obvious 'pedestrian' angle. Oh, well.
The use of the expression 'fun effect' is also curious. Before I go any further, tell me which 'fun effect' you're referring to.

Because my experience in the rabbit hole suggests that the 'fun effect' most people think Brown discovered is not the effect that he did discover, and the about effect that he did discover... we know basically nothing.

Rabbit holes are like that.
.
.
Paul Schatzkin, aka "The Perfesser" – Founder and Host of Fusor.net
Author of The Boy Who Invented Television: 2023 Edition – https://amz.run/6ag1
"Fusion is not 20 years in the future; it is 60 years in the past and we missed it."
User avatar
Dennis P Brown
Posts: 3147
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 10:46 am
Real name: Dennis Brown

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Dennis P Brown »

Gravity is not a force in general relativity; further, pretty much all physicists accept this as fact. That said, in elementary physics (Often first year, and High school) the formula and 'force' idea developed by Newton is still used. This is identical to how classical physics is used instead of special, or even general relativity - we know light has a finite speed but in classical, we assume it is infinite, so the math is easier. Not unlike how an electric coil generates a magnetic field but in special relativity that is an electric field due to the speed of the electrons - a lot of not accurate but 'let's not confuse' starting students with complex math-based theories is still used. Glad they are because the math requirements for the accurate theories are rarely taught at the undergraduate level. And when they are, its senior level. So freshman physics would be a nightmare (more than it is ;) ) if we required general relativity (GR) and its required mathematics for first year (or High school) students.

As for your question about 'sitting there' the fact is, all objects are in 'free fall'. As such, the Earth stops your 'natural state of free fall' and that is the force you feel. The force you are sensing is fictious in that no attraction is really occurring - there are no gravitons being exchanged. Rather the space is 'curved' s.t. you and the Earth share that space effect and you follow that path in your free fall towards Earth. Why so many sources still use that there are four, not three forces, is due primarily to what I have said - the reality would likely confuse 99% of the people and so physicist just let it slide - silly but that is the way it is. I don't approve of that very wrong acceptance at all and that is why here, in this science based forum, I explain the facts that are available to scientifically inclined people. You are certainly welcomed to continue to express that gravity is a force† - most people treat it as such and it is simpler, too. I have no problem with that but I will not follow an incorrect idea.

Yes, Wiki, or even in General Physics (first year) courses* it is treated as a real force, but the fact is, current experimental evidence does not support that idea. Certainly, GR does not and that theory explains a lot of known effects in the Universe and is one of the most accurate and deeply insightful theories ever developed and tested.

The only way to have 'anti-gravity' is if space curvature could be opposite. That, I believe, would likely require negative mass - whatever that is. To date, antimatter in extensive testing has shown no such properties so negative mass is still just a concept. As for gravity and electro-magnetism, they are not related. This is mainly due to the issue that gravity has no known force carrier - the hoped for graviton. Physicist would love it if such a force carrier existed but all attempts to 1) find it have failed 2) even model it at all have failed.

This issue is not unlike the problem we have when we are on Earth in a vast open area. It absolutely looks flat but as we are told the Earth is curved - that is, its average surface is curved - we still accept that the Earth is really a nearly round object despite the perception it does not look that way to our unaided eye. One can be fooled by one's unaided senses.

As for fun effect, Richard explained it. Yes, I do like that effect that Mr. Brown discovered. But it is easily explained and unless someone has reproducible proof, speculation after the occurrence does not make something true. Mr. Brown was likely sincere in his beliefs but wanting to believe something can also warp one's approach and experiments - happens far too often in science.

For instance, most of us (myself included) have often been impressed by accomplishments by ancient peoples that are so amazing compared to many things we do today that we refuse to accept that normal people did them. Like how did mere humans with only knowledge available 5000 years ago build the pyramids? Well, they did leave records (often these were ignored or discounted), and physical clues and now we understand how they did it and while amazing still, the techniques they used are very straight forward technology. Ditto for Roman concrete (lasts thousands of years unlike ours,) They got lucky to have a premade 'lime like' mineral from a local volcano. That very unique component (which has been located) made their concrete vastly superior to anything we have developed (though that is changing thanks to that discovery.) One can just assume super science, or one can accept reality for these amazing achievements by the ancients.

This aspect of current science frankly tends to destroy the magic we all want in the world (and I too miss that :( ) but huge claims require huge proof.

Who knows, maybe one day someone will develop a better theory than GR and the graviton will then be discovered. So gravity will once again be treated as a force. I seriously doubt this and highly suspect that in one hundred years GR will continue to be used - assuming human caused global warming, new viruses and wars caused by this warming, still enable an existing interconnected and advancing world where people are working on these issues rather than simple survival. Though even then, I highly doubt the Earth's human population will be even half the current eight billion plus thanks to these issues.

* Those texts really should have a corrective footnote to fix this misleading idea!
Last edited by Dennis P Brown on Wed Apr 05, 2023 10:38 am, edited 3 times in total.
Frank Sanns
Site Admin
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 2:26 pm
Real name: Frank Sanns

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Frank Sanns »

Yes, great book. Thanks Paul!


What is the accepted place to publish a theory of everything to establish priority? I know there are many, many misses out there but just curious.
Achiever's madness; when enough is still not enough. ---FS
We have to stop looking at the world through our physical eyes. The universe is NOT what we see. It is the quantum world that is real. The rest is just an electron illusion. ---FS
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

As for publishing the theory of everything....

Nature is the premiere journal for the world. It has prestige and a place honored by scientists over the years. However, to me it is equal to the "Scientific American" for the elite and anointed. While peer reviewed, Most of its content is old news to the various people in the specific field reported. Why? Because each scientific field has its own peer reviewed journals, Like the Journal of Plasma Physics. It will not accept articles on biological discoveries or medicine, like the Journal of the AMA or Lancet Journals.

I imagine the theory of everything would be, at first, a mathematical exposition put forward in abstract terms. The physicists would then to think up an experiment to verify all of its ramifications. Journals specific to these fields would be the place to publish first as your theory would find its best critical reviews in these journals as you are battered and beat up through re-writes prior to it even seeing the light of day in one of these journals. There are "try fits" such as Physics Letters A, where you float an idea, or conclusion which may include experiment.

The common man may get a headline, "jumping the gun" like the recent BS about fusion from NIF, raising false hopes of fusion energy for the low and down at heel folks looking for good news in a world filled with all manner of night terrors.

Science tends to publish in and amongst its own. In this manner an idea can quickly be given the lie, or seem plausable enough against the many slings and arrows of its detractors within the discipline to be allowed a "maybe" open to further serious study.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

Pauls' book is historical in nature related to a single man's life's work. As such, it is his excellent telling of the tales by others to him and his research into the newspapers and reports of the period. Including, even a "he said - she said" about whether he went to colleges that Brown claimed he went to. Paul researched this specific rabbit hole via documents and verbal stories.

The entire book is a rabbit hole that intrigues the reader from, be the reader, a dolt to a Scientist. (that is a wide audience)

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Dennis P Brown
Posts: 3147
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 10:46 am
Real name: Dennis Brown

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Dennis P Brown »

I would be failing if I didn't add just how impressed I am by the incredible accomplishment that Paul Schatzkin has achieved in writing a book on the life of T.T. Brown!

This is obviously a work of someone extremely interested in novel ideas and approaches to science - something far too often ignored except for 'big names' in science.

My diversion into the rabbit hole of gravitational forces was a needless distraction from the interesting post/thread by Richard on this excellent book.

I very much look forward to further posts on this fascinating book that Richard is refencing.
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

I am up to chapter 36 in this 90 chapter book! It answers a long held question by me....How did a non-college grad who enlisted in the navy as a an enlisted man, (common swabee), wind up as a navel officer?? Much good research done by Paul that, unfortunately, often bores deeper down the rabbit hole for the reader.

I now understand why in the early 2000's Paul would express to me his grave frustrations in his quest to tell the story of T.T. Brown.

Many who have regularly attended the October HEAS gatherings might remember Paul's evening talk to all assembled about his frustration over getting the straight story about T.T. Brown. As I see it, Paul had two ways to go, both involved just "giving up".....Stop the entire effort or publish the entire effort. I am glad he chose to publish.

In the end, the reader will have exited the rabbit hole and have to decide for themselves.... Was Brown a brilliant yet failed investigator/inventor or a self-aggrandizing, skilled, con-man with the gift of gab followed up by real work to keep 'em locked into funding his efforts? Was he involved in secret work surrounded by spooks from intelligence agencies? Perhaps he was a bit of all?

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

I found this interesting and well done video and now toss it into the rabbit hole.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS_rEzKdzBA&t=35s

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Dennis P Brown
Posts: 3147
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 10:46 am
Real name: Dennis Brown

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Dennis P Brown »

Watched the vid. Again, fun. Also, they and the experts agree this isn't antigravity but possibly another effect. That said, does it work or not? Well, not answered in the vid but her computations were valid (peer reviewed.) That is NOT the same as proof of a device's actual operating properties or the real mechanism - that requires others to confirm. Does not appear either she did that and others tried but they too failed (yes, various excuses for this were given so her affect could still be considered viable - of course.) Apparently the affect is either too small to clearly establish a clear answer or maybe just isn't there.

So, is it possible by General Relativity? Not likely (again, requires negative space curvature) and as for gravity shielding - well, that is simply impossible by any accepted theory. I certainly won't discount the possible affect since she based it upon some valid physical foundations or it wouldn't have passed peer review.

Is it possible some type of useful effect that elevates a substance that does this can work at all? Well, maybe but that she never really did, nor anyone else, indicates to me that the answer is likely no. That she disappeared (and thank goodness it is made into a mystery or else we'd know one way or another) tends to indicate her work did not succeed even to her own satisfaction. It is stated in the vid that she went to China (not unreasonable) but somehow they know by means not mentioned, that - of course - the Chinese are 'pouring money' into this project. Sorry, that really makes me doubt this information on her efforts (not that it is impossible but unlikely they could really know this as fact.)

As for DoD funding - that occurs if an idea has merit and hers' certainly did. That they gave up on it certainly shows she failed to deliver on the goals she had set for the funding.

The death ray or vaporizing stuff is total B.S. and since she never claimed such nonsense that should not have been included. Even if the other antigravity person who was fired after no repeatable results said that silliness.

Certainly another rabbit hole but also one that has some believable scientific aspects to it. So, final judgement by my viewing -it is a fun vid but as for the device: well, seeing will be believing but not holding my breath for this to occur. That is, unless the Chinese send another floating device here that has no balloon attached :)
User avatar
Paul_Schatzkin
Site Admin
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 12:49 pm
Real name: aka The Perfesser
Contact:

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Paul_Schatzkin »

.
{Thank you guys for this discussion. I am in the middle of and updated revision of my Farnsworth bio so that the two books together will look 'of a piece.' When I'm done with that I can spend some more time digesting all of the above. In the meantime... What follows is thoroughly uncororaborated, but since that's par for the course with 'all things Townsend Brown,' it can't make the discourse any more muddled than it already is. So... }

Last month I spoke by phone with one of the more active contributors in the old Townsend Brown forums (https://ttbrown.com/forum) when they were active between 2005-2009. He used the sock-puppet handle 'Mikado' on those forums, and until he acquiesces to the use of his actual name, I'll continue to protect his secret identity.

When things went off the cliff in 2009, 'Mikado' was building a solid dielectric gravitator.

So far as I know this is the only contemporary experiment with a solid dielectric stack, as Brown articulates in his early patents; it is very different from the fluid dielectric / ionic wind 'lifter'-type configuration – which, as I discuss in the book, may have been introduced as a way of deliberately discrediting Brown in the interest of diverting attention from his more sensitive work (insert #speculation here).

I don't remember the details of the Mikado's construction. I only remember that it consisted of a stack of electrodes and dielectric plates in the form of barium titanate. I have a couple of those barium titanate disks on my desk as I type and will attach a photo to this post.

When I asked Mikado about the gravitator he built, he said...
"It worked. It got lighter. On a calibrated scale, it weighed in 3 pound, 4 ounces. With DC power applied, it went down to 1 pound, 14 ounces."
Forgive me for not asking how much voltage was applied.

He then takes issue with the results Brown reported from his experiments in the 1920s-30s:
"...he talks about it being on a pendulum and going up and staying up, even when you take the power off. I worked with some discs many years ago, and it never did anything remotely like that."
While Mikado insists that what he observed is by no means an 'antigravity' effect, we are still left to wonder, umm... what could reduce "the mass of the mass"?

This was the first time I have talked to Mikado in at least ten years. The conversation was borderline contentious, since his relationship with Brown's daughter broke down much the same way mine did in 2009. He still has a great deal of resentment around that. Suffice it to say he cast a lot of aspersions on my sources.

I am posting this tasty tidbit only because this is, to the extent it's useful at all, the only instance I am aware of where somebody built a solid dielectric device based on the (so called) 'Biefeld Brown Effect.' One of the recurring themes in the book is this idea that if Brown discovered something original, it is manifest in the solid dielectric device, not the fluid dielectric device. Emphasis here is on the word "if."

Over the course of the narrative, there are several instances where knowledgeable witness reported something novel in Brown's devices. They are spelled out over the course of the book.

Mikado's results might be one more instance. I guess somebody else will have to build a similar device and provide a more detailed and verifiable account before we can accept the results.

Maybe someday Mikado will have more to say on the subject. But, of course, if he's gonna talk about here (or now on the resuscitated TTBrown forum), he'll have to use is honest-to-god real name.

I'm not holding my breath.

Now behold, the barium titanate discs:
Attachments
IMG_5851.jpeg
Paul Schatzkin, aka "The Perfesser" – Founder and Host of Fusor.net
Author of The Boy Who Invented Television: 2023 Edition – https://amz.run/6ag1
"Fusion is not 20 years in the future; it is 60 years in the past and we missed it."
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

Barium Titanate is extremely dense (heavy for it size). Alas, we have zero detailed data or diagram on his actual construction, voltage and current.
All the Titanates have dielectric constants going through the roof, >1000 is common. Unfortunately, their breakdown voltage per mil is low.

His reported "lift" is about 22 ounces. (mass did not go anywhere) Ion wind typically lifts grams. I love the way specifics of amazing claims are always short of images, details and thus, never subject to independent verification. And folks wonder why there are so many doubting Thomas' around this subject!

It is good to hear that Mikado is on the job. Believe him at your peril.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Paul_Schatzkin
Site Admin
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 12:49 pm
Real name: aka The Perfesser
Contact:

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Paul_Schatzkin »

Richard Hull wrote: Thu Apr 06, 2023 6:20 pm It is good to hear that Mikado is on the job. Believe him at your peril.
The same could be said of just about every source who has ever chimed in on this topic (present company excluded, of course).
Paul Schatzkin, aka "The Perfesser" – Founder and Host of Fusor.net
Author of The Boy Who Invented Television: 2023 Edition – https://amz.run/6ag1
"Fusion is not 20 years in the future; it is 60 years in the past and we missed it."
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

As Franklin said, "Let the experiment be done!" Let it be done before a critical audience with full disclosure! (images of gear and full data)
We have called it "open source" now for years. The forums here are a shining example of how open source must present itself.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Dennis P Brown
Posts: 3147
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 10:46 am
Real name: Dennis Brown

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Dennis P Brown »

If someone refuses to give the details so others can replicate the experiment the claims should automatically be dismissed - HOWEVER! That is NOT the same as saying they did not see what they claimed to have seen.

Only that whatever they measured is either 1) does not work and they did something wrong that gave them the positive result or if it worked 2) but they can't reproduce that result again. I assume (maybe foolishly) that these people do experiments in good faith and are not lying. While this occurs, I honestly think most such amateur experimenters do try to be honest - yes, I really do. Unlike the big fusion project leaders.

I follow empirical knowledge (hence my issue with gravity not being a force) and if someone believes gravitons are real, then saying gravity is a force certainly follows.

The old I'm keeping it 'secret' because it's too dangerous, or the CIA will get me or I'm waiting due to ???? really, really gets old.

As always, great claims require great proof before I accept them as true

Regardless of this diversion, I am still interested in the T.T. Brown book. That you are writing another book is just so impressive and a subject that really desires more attention. I posted a bronze and life size statue of Farnsworth in another thread. Apparently, at least in San Franscisco, he is highly appreciated for his creations and contributions.
User avatar
Paul_Schatzkin
Site Admin
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 12:49 pm
Real name: aka The Perfesser
Contact:

'Mikdado's Claims

Post by Paul_Schatzkin »

Dennis P Brown wrote: Fri Apr 07, 2023 10:40 am If someone refuses to give the details so others can replicate the experiment the claims should automatically be dismissed - HOWEVER! That is NOT the same as saying they did not see what they claimed to have seen.
I pretty much agree with everything Richard and Dennis are saying here about the veracity of Mikado's claims.

I posted what I did only because it is the closest I have to an answer to the likely question, "has anybody done anything with Brown's work (other than the lifter stuff) in this century? In the past forty or fifty years?

Mikado's statement is the only answer I presently have to that question – and I make that statement knowing full well that a statement over the phone and relayed in a post on the Internet is as reliable as the 73-year-old Chevy pickup in my garage.

Also, if memory serves me, when I recently asked Richard if he and Charles Yost conducted any experiments at ESJ with solid dielectric instruments, I'm pretty sure the answer that question was in the negative. I stand ready to be corrected if I'm wrong about that, too.

All of this underscores the difficulty of reporting anything as it pertains to the life of Townsend Brown.

Or, as I said to a friend who is reading the book, "I sometimes wish I'd open the book with a disclaimer like the one that opens the movie American Hustle: "Some of this actually happened."

And I'd feel better about the whole undertaking if I had a better idea where the line is drawn between what did and did not 'actually happen.'

No wonder I ran screaming out of the room with my hair on fire back in '09. And likewise, I have moments where I question my judgment about going back down the rabbit hole last year.

YMMV.

--P
Paul Schatzkin, aka "The Perfesser" – Founder and Host of Fusor.net
Author of The Boy Who Invented Television: 2023 Edition – https://amz.run/6ag1
"Fusion is not 20 years in the future; it is 60 years in the past and we missed it."
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

To set the record Straight, ESI never did any research with di-electrics related to spacecraft propulsion or electrogravitic work. We wished to see motion of some sort that was power efficient related to lift or movement. Mass in all cases was kept low to detect even slight effects. We did market and sold the ESI "Electro-Wand" as a demo for electrostatics and motion control with the suspension in air of a light aluminized Mylar film loop ribbon.
I have demo'd this wand-loop item at a few HEAS meetings and the October conferences over the years. It is really cool.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

I have found an "Electric Spacecraft" website! no relation to ESI. I attach a URL. this is a serious site and someone is spending real money on kit and instruments! This is not a bunch of cheapo cobbled experimental gear. It is totally electrostatic in nature from what I see, but the work is open sourced! Included for those interested .

https://www.electricspacecraft.org/the-experiments.html

Apparently there is a CAY library site (Charles A. Yost) This includes offers for sale of digital copies of all the old 48 issues of the Electric Spacecraft Journal. While ESI, Inc. is dead, I think Charle's daughter or son is keeping their father's legacy out there. Here in the URL

https://caylibrary.com/



Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Dennis P Brown
Posts: 3147
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 10:46 am
Real name: Dennis Brown

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Dennis P Brown »

Wow, that is some detailed and well done work but ruined by their concluding non-sense.

Also, rather confused by what they achieved (sorry, I only skimmed their work and looked at their results.) Now they set up opposite charges on the plates and measured an attractive force. If I recall, opposite charges attract (duh) and their charged plates are doing that. So could someone point out to me exactly what they did that is so impressive they can make these claims (here I'll give their conclusion that caught my attention):

"Chemical rockets, ion engines, airplanes, helicopters, and any machine that flies now has its days numbered. Soon the Land speeder, a hovering ground-based vehicle, and the hover board, are going to be a reality by the end of the next decade. Power plants capable of lifting and moving large weights using kilowatts or less of electric power is soon to become a reality."

All that aside - impressive effort no matter what - an experiment that was well documented and appears to have good data taking instrumentation. As for their further claims in that conclusion (far more "out there" then even the above) - well, I'll let those pass.

An aside: they seem to have forgot that an electric motor was used to power the plates up to speed. So, unless I missed it, their final total energy balance didn't appear to include that for their total power that was required to create the 25 milli-Newtons of 'lift' from the energy of residue in the the plates.
Last edited by Dennis P Brown on Sat Apr 08, 2023 3:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

You hit it. They spent time and money and did the experiment, regardless of the outcome and conclusions. This leaves them wide open for just critical review.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Paul_Schatzkin
Site Admin
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 12:49 pm
Real name: aka The Perfesser
Contact:

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Paul_Schatzkin »

Richard Hull wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 2:13 pmThe equations and all field theory force two values to exist to a specific value to define the speed of light within a vacuum. These are the permittivity of free space (~8.8 picofarads/meter) and the permittivity of free space (1.25 uH/meter).... (Look up permittivity and permeability if you dare to try and understand further).
Uh, Richard, can you help us out here? It seems you used the word 'permittivity' twice - shouldn't one of them be 'permeability'?

There is a chapter in the book called 'Structure of Space' (#49) that uses these terms, drawn from something that Brown wrote while at Vega Aircraft in the mid-1940s. I didn't use a lot of detail from that paper, but used it to drawn a couple of conclusions based more on what my 'covert sources' were telling me. I'll be curious what you think of that chapter.
This is why, in a vacuum, the effect on the system understudy sees no relative motion to its background surroundings.
And, here, do you mean 'the system under study' (because to the best of my knowledge 'understudy' is a theatrical term).

If so, then this might be one of the points of contention (or just plain mystery?). There were several occasions when something... how do I put this? ... 'unaccounted for in conventional physics' was observed in something Brown built. That is what Biefeld attested to in the affidavit we found in Brown's Navy records, and also alluded to in the reports from the experiments in Paris. Bahnson came to a similar conclusion though by a somewhat more oblique route (I think the experiments most associated with Bahnson, based on the 16mm film footage, are more 'fluid dielectric' or 'ionic wind' experiments).
In air, the huge electrical stress seen to move the "Naudin lifter" of dissimilar sized electrodes is due to ion wind (charged molecules set in motion off the small wire electrode above the thin foil aluminum sheet below.
Let me know when you get to the 'Wounded Prairie Chicken' routine (late 40s/early 50s). The inference is that Brown was 'hiding' behind Ion Wind to divert attention from... well, something, we may never know what exactly. If anything.

That's pretty much how it goes in this rabbit hole; at times at seems bottomless, and at other times I suspect there may be no rabbit at all.
.
.
Paul Schatzkin, aka "The Perfesser" – Founder and Host of Fusor.net
Author of The Boy Who Invented Television: 2023 Edition – https://amz.run/6ag1
"Fusion is not 20 years in the future; it is 60 years in the past and we missed it."
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14976
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Reading th' perfesser's new book. He's done it again!

Post by Richard Hull »

I have corrected and emboldened the 4/02 posting. Typing too fast with little sleep. Fixed now.

Permittivity is the purely electrical nature of space. Permeability is a purely magnetic nature of space. Motion in space by light demands these two combined values to exist and travel. Thus, the electromagnetic wave. Some think these are mutable over time (epochs)

In a purely electrostatic sense, with just voltage applied, there is never any significant current flow, unless you have ion wind which can cause a continuous lift motion as only voltage and current can cause continued motion, thrust or torque. (electric motor, door bell buzzer, etc.. Regardless of how much or how little voltage you have or apply, there must be a magnetic component associated with it to make the applied energy produce a continuous force, thereby, motion.

I think what Brown, Bahnson, and Charles Yost believed or felt that changing these values around a craft could somehow with out any explanation of how to do it could negate gravity and then propel a craft. Gravity, the bending of space, (take yer choice), due to the presence of matter, has never been linked in any manner to the electromagnetic forces. (God knows, the best of the best have and are still trying) As many experiments have been performed with the Brown idea in a vacuum chamber and no effect observed, the idea is rather dead. It will be noted that even in a vacuum the impulse of applying the high voltage will cause an instantaneous movement, but that is it! As a current is momentarily drawn in the electrostatic system which goes electrodynamic but for only an instant.

I am into the "black part" Chapter 48 is the next to be read as time permits.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Post Reply

Return to “Announcements and Site Administration Topics”