dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

It may be difficult to separate "theory" from "application," but let''s see if this helps facilitate the discussion.
Post Reply
stefan.kuzminski
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:44 am
Real name:

dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by stefan.kuzminski »

Don't know if this has been posted elsewhere, new patent out of US Navy,

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2019/0295733.html

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... on-reactor
User avatar
Paul_Schatzkin
Site Admin
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 12:49 pm
Real name: aka The Perfesser
Contact:

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by Paul_Schatzkin »

More magnets.

They’ll never learn.

—PS
Paul Schatzkin, aka "The Perfesser" – Founder and Host of Fusor.net
Author of The Boy Who Invented Television: 2023 Edition – https://amz.run/6ag1
"Fusion is not 20 years in the future; it is 60 years in the past and we missed it."
User avatar
Bob Reite
Posts: 576
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:03 pm
Real name: Bob Reite
Location: Wilkes Barre/Scranton area

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by Bob Reite »

Controlling a plasma with a magnetic field is like trying to hold Jello with rubber bands.
The more reactive the materials, the more spectacular the failures.
The testing isn't over until the prototype is destroyed.
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14992
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by Richard Hull »

When fusion researchers finally get the magnets in just the right configuration with just the right field shape and the perfect magnetic strength they will have a bunch of magnets in a configuration with a field that has some known strength. Fusion? Well that is another whole kettle of fish.

More magnets! There are never enough magnets.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Paul_Schatzkin
Site Admin
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 12:49 pm
Real name: aka The Perfesser
Contact:

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by Paul_Schatzkin »

Glad you guys share my sentiments about magnets. I’ve heard that line about jello and rubber bands before. May have to use it...

—PS
Paul Schatzkin, aka "The Perfesser" – Founder and Host of Fusor.net
Author of The Boy Who Invented Television: 2023 Edition – https://amz.run/6ag1
"Fusion is not 20 years in the future; it is 60 years in the past and we missed it."
stefan.kuzminski
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:44 am
Real name:

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by stefan.kuzminski »

I understand that the deep experience of the folks on this board would tend to a skeptical viewpoint
but come'on let's pick it apart just a little more than that..

I doubt I understand it, but apparently the claim is that some piezoelectric effect used to create a coherent 'spinning and/or accelerated vibration' in the plasma.
I suppose compared to a 'normal' radio-frequency heating which gives more of a hot mess.
hard to imagine the grid physically spinning, although we can hope..

There are a set of patents from this gentleman, all in a similar vein
https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Sa ... tore+Pais)
User avatar
Dennis P Brown
Posts: 3160
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 10:46 am
Real name: Dennis Brown

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by Dennis P Brown »

Many in the real fusion community are laughing about this - but then, anything can be patented if it is different. A patent does not require anything to work, just not violate laws of physics. I won't worry about this effort enough to even evaluate it any further - zero money will be put into it and that's exactly what this idea is worth.
Patrick Lindecker
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:47 am
Real name: Patrick Lindecker
Location: Maisons-Alfort France

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by Patrick Lindecker »

Hello Dennis,

I have a doubt about patents in USA. It seems possible to patent ideas. Do you confirm?
This is not possible here (France and surely Europe). You need a "proof of concept". You cannot patent ideas.

I read the patent. The author suggests that he is able to produce 1E6 teslas (with toroidal coils...). It is just enormous whereas passing 5 Teslas is a challenge (without considering the enormous mechanical constraints generated). I understand that obtaining 1E6 Teslas easily would be, of course, great for fusion. However it is a wish and this comes back to my question about patenting an idea.
Moreover there are no details, just generalities which could not permit to a standard enginner to realize the prototype (normally a patent must have sufficiently details to permit the construction of the prototype for an engineer of the same field).

Note: the author refers to a paper that I'm going to read.

Patrick Lindecker
stefan.kuzminski
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:44 am
Real name:

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by stefan.kuzminski »

Clearly the patent system in the USA is totally dysfunctional and even corrupt, and this work is easy to categorize as 'fake news' without any demonstrated embodiment.

But laughing grey-beards are a poor indicator of the worth of new ideas if history is any guide..

Does anyone know of other groups working with piezoelectric materials in a containment design?
User avatar
Paul_Schatzkin
Site Admin
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 12:49 pm
Real name: aka The Perfesser
Contact:

Patents Make Headlines...

Post by Paul_Schatzkin »

...but often for all the wrong reasons.

I think this whole story – it's publication, the reactions to it – reflect a) the culture's hunger for this kind of energy and b) the media's total lack of judgement regarding news of the subject. That began basically in 1989 with the feeding frenzy over "Cold Fusion" continues to this day.

The subject continues to curry cultural favor, from "Back to The Future" ("....Roads? Where we're going, we don't roads...") to more recent expressions. Over the weekend I watched the 2012 movie "Cloud Atlas," which includes some rather exotic transport vessels. When asked how the vessels are powered, the answer is "fusion engines." Well, duh, sure, 200 years into the fictional future...

The world wants – and with each passing day more desperately needs – this form of energy.

But I am finally coming to the realization – which is not easy to articulate but I'm getting there – that the reason fusion energy is not at our disposal has nothing to do with the technology and everything to do with the shortcomings of the species (that would be us humans) that has come to the threshold of its realization.

More on that, hopefully sooner rather than later.

--PS
Paul Schatzkin, aka "The Perfesser" – Founder and Host of Fusor.net
Author of The Boy Who Invented Television: 2023 Edition – https://amz.run/6ag1
"Fusion is not 20 years in the future; it is 60 years in the past and we missed it."
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14992
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by Richard Hull »

Fusion will not be like fission. Fission is the classic cocked gun. Just like wood, coal and gas, all we have to do is gather this ammo load it into the energy gun...(Furnace, boiler, car engine), and pull the trigger. To get fission going, we just move the pieces of U235 close together and it happens, energy galore! (Actually we load the stuff in the reactor to criticality, but with neutron absorbing rods to prevent a run away, then pull the rods out as needed to obtain just the right amount of energy we want. This is all the result of failing fusion many Billions of years ago when a massive super nova had the energy needed to form Uranium atoms and stored that last gasp of stellar energy in those atoms in the form of nuclear binding energy.

Currently, this is exactly what our fusion based, gravity powered sun does and has been doing for us albeit at the chemical level here on earth. Early man relied on solar fusion to grown trees and other vegetation so he could burn the stuff to keep warm, make his huts,etc. (Chemical energy) More recently man has used solar fusion energy stored in the the oil, coal and gas produced millions of years ago from decaying, compressed things that once lived and died back then. (Again, chemical energy) In the 20th century we learned about nuclear energy and again hunter-gathered Uranium with its bounty of stored dying star energy. This energy made chemical energy look feeble by comparison. Solar cells are another joke power source on a large scale without acres of land needed for megawatt battery systems.

The very best use of current solar energy with the greatest immediate and direct conversion return is hydro power. The sun lifts billions of tons of water into the atmosphere which ultimately falls upon the high ground and then we dam up this water and use gravity to generate gigawatts of hydro power. Hydro power would not be possible if gravity did not exist. For it is gravity and gravity alone that makes stars and thus fusion and causes water to seek its lowest potential energy. (Water falls off a man-made cliff slamming into turbine blades to turn the generator.) The universe is powered and kept active solely by potential energies acting on matter. There is no innate kinetic energy or light in the universe that the potential energies did not bring forth, from light to motion.

Finally back to fusion.....No matter what we do, fusion will require tremendous input energy to force whatever ions we choose to defeat the safety mechanism that nature has put in place to prevent stars from going off like firecrackers in the night sky. This is the electrostatic repulsion between protons (positive nuclei) and the potential energy found in the Quantum barrier in which probabilities rule. These probabilities typically mandate that the house always comes out the winner and you suffer the net losses.


So, it turns out we have been using fusion energy from the time we stole fire from the gods to burn stuff. We are trying to abandon our chemical energy bounty only of late as we feel it sullies our atmosphere. The fission bounty is shunned as it seems to make a lot of unacceptable waste. Fusion is the be all and end all now and, as I say, "it always will be"

Hope, as they say, springs eternal and there is always my lucky donkey concept...Some person like Becquerel who might trip over the solution while doing something else. Does this lucky donkey walk among us yet?

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
ian_krase
Posts: 636
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:48 am
Real name: Ian Krase

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by ian_krase »

Before this kind of argument (which I don't quite agree with the conclusion of), it would seem like the hydrogen bomb, which we know all too well works reliably and tremendously effectively, is a kind of anomaly. It works reliably and quite effectively, though it requires a fission reaction to set it off -- something not yet rivaled by the likes of the NIF's lasers or the Z-machine's magnetic can crusher.

I can think clearly of one particular peaceful purpose for which that form of intensely inertial-confinement fusion is well-suited: The propulsion of high-thrust, high-specific-impulse spacecraft through space using the Project Orion principle.
User avatar
Dennis P Brown
Posts: 3160
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 10:46 am
Real name: Dennis Brown

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by Dennis P Brown »

A few more "words" on the various subjects mentioned here.

The start of the universe neither required fusion nor any energy input (that we understand in the slightest) but this certainly say's there is more to the universe than our current physics understanding - in fact, all energy currently or previously created by suns via fusion was created at the start of the universe via that event. So, don't give up on fusion - we know it can produce far more energy than required to ignite it (the hydrogen bomb is the nasty example) but magnetic might just work - if it does, it certainly will not be cheap no matter the method but it does look like it can work via the stellarator.

Solar power via solar cells certainly does work (at a competitive cost during a sunny day) and works very well (as does thermal storage, by the way) - of course, lack of low enough cost batteries prevent after hours use of that energy but that is also certainly changing (slowly but steadily on power density and cost.) Wind works very well currently and while it too needs better batteries, it isn't as limited as solar cells (wind does blow at night but regular power is the issue, of course.)

Nuclear fission is very costly but a large part of that is the terrible design of all American reactors - the Candu is an example of a possible lower cost reactor. Breeders (via fission) is both hideously expensive and extremely dangerous and simply not worth the effort; however, a poor tokamak like ITER could be a breeder in a more cost effective manner and is an area that shouldn't be dismissed out-of-hand.

Fusion for space propulsion isn't exactly easy even if magnetic fusion works - magnetic fusion would never provide enough thrust; rather, implosion via direct drive of pellets for mini-nuke's are the most likely method but the engineering for that makes magnetic fusion look easy.

There are no dark-horse nor easy methods for fusion and that is why everyone who knows very little always try's to leap frog these issues via extreme ideas - like the study of any complex subject, it takes a long time to master before one starts to understand the field. Magic would be far easier (or aliens ...lol) and why people want to believe. Fusion energy will take a lot of study before we understand it enough to make it viable. But it will become viable in the next twenty years but only after much more work, huge costs are paid for new research machines, and massive efforts by many people. Even with current lower budgets, cheap natural gas (for now) availability, fusion research is still progressing in a very real way.
Jason_Gorecki
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:13 am
Real name: Jason Gorecki

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by Jason_Gorecki »

@Paul_Schatzkin.
What would you say those human shortcomings are?
User avatar
Paul_Schatzkin
Site Admin
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 12:49 pm
Real name: aka The Perfesser
Contact:

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by Paul_Schatzkin »

Oh, jeezus.

Just read a headline.

Where would you like me to start?

—PS
Paul Schatzkin, aka "The Perfesser" – Founder and Host of Fusor.net
Author of The Boy Who Invented Television: 2023 Edition – https://amz.run/6ag1
"Fusion is not 20 years in the future; it is 60 years in the past and we missed it."
John Futter
Posts: 1848
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 10:29 pm
Real name: John Futter
Contact:

Re: dynamic fusor patent, Salvatore Pais

Post by John Futter »

Paul
That was Jasons first post

another one who doesn't read the rules and acting troll like
User avatar
Paul_Schatzkin
Site Admin
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 12:49 pm
Real name: aka The Perfesser
Contact:

Posting Perils?

Post by Paul_Schatzkin »

Just when you think it's safe to wade back in... newbie trolls?

<*sigh*>

--PS
Paul Schatzkin, aka "The Perfesser" – Founder and Host of Fusor.net
Author of The Boy Who Invented Television: 2023 Edition – https://amz.run/6ag1
"Fusion is not 20 years in the future; it is 60 years in the past and we missed it."
Post Reply

Return to “Fusor and/or General Fusion Theory (& FAQs)”