Joe Gayo's lab tour

For posts specifically relating to fusor design, construction, and operation.
User avatar
Dennis P Brown
Posts: 1716
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 2:46 pm
Real name: Dennis P Brown
Location: Glen Arm, MD

Re: Joe Gayo's lab tour

Post by Dennis P Brown » Tue Jun 18, 2019 9:15 pm

I too used a bubble detector to first determine that a smaller chamber does, in fact, lead to greater fusion. I did this about a year or so ago. I am glad to see this work taken further and with better accuracy. I agree with Richard, and why this also caught my attention for confirmation - smaller chambers (i.e. distance from cathode to ground and higher deuterium operating pressure) does result in significantly higher fusion rates. Your results are very good and effort outstanding.

Dan Knapp
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:34 pm
Real name: Dan Knapp

Re: Joe Gayo's lab tour

Post by Dan Knapp » Tue Jun 18, 2019 9:43 pm

Joe

Can you explain your magnetic field plot? This appears to be a half image of the cross section of two ring magnets (that would also be cathodes?). Is this correct?

If so, it is not clear how you would get magnetic shielding with the field lines terminating on the cathodes.

Joe Gayo
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:34 am
Real name: Joe Gayo
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Joe Gayo's lab tour

Post by Joe Gayo » Tue Jun 18, 2019 9:55 pm

The cathode is in the center along the axis of the magnetic field (the plot is oriented vertically but the actual layout is horizontal)

(P.S. I'm working on a paper that I planing on submitting to a journal to discuss this system.)

Robert Dwyer
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 9:34 pm
Real name: Robert Dwyer
Location: New Mexico

Re: Joe Gayo's lab tour

Post by Robert Dwyer » Wed Jun 19, 2019 12:09 am

Neutron counts into the 1e7 range with a smaller chamber! Wow! I never though I would see it. This is a great system. It is cool to see that you are using software like FEMM to investigate your fields. It would be interesting to see plots of the E-field in your setup as well.

After going back through my data and reading some articles, I had gotten the mindset that the high operating pressures were in fact hurting as the ions would collide with too many neutrals not allowing them to reach higher energies. It appears I was wrong. Perhaps these systems want more power (voltage and current) in the high pressure regime, or perhaps my old system was not clean enough to see the big numbers... Either way, great job.
Of course you also have that background field, who knows how much of these improved numbers come from each of things, or any combination of these things.
If we throw more money at it, it will have to work... right?

Joe Gayo
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:34 am
Real name: Joe Gayo
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Joe Gayo's lab tour

Post by Joe Gayo » Wed Jun 19, 2019 12:21 am

How about a PIC simulation that shows the time evolved potential field:
https://youtu.be/wEO5Ewo_H_w (Note: The cathode is at 0V and the chamber walls at 50kV)
Last edited by Joe Gayo on Wed Jun 19, 2019 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Scott Moroch
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:48 am
Real name: Scott Moroch
Location: New Jersey

Re: Joe Gayo's lab tour

Post by Scott Moroch » Wed Jun 19, 2019 3:30 am

I was interested in your 7-hole grid design. The models support the observations.

Simulation Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5lp3Wu ... e=youtu.be

Initial distribution is circular, launched from the left with 0 KE. Grid at -60kV with respect to the chamber.
Attachments
Image 2.PNG
Image 1.PNG
"In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity"
-Albert Einstein

Rex Allers
Posts: 397
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:39 am
Real name:
Location: San Jose CA

Re: Joe Gayo's lab tour

Post by Rex Allers » Wed Jun 19, 2019 12:16 pm

So PIC simulation is new to me. From a little searching I assume this is
particle-in-cell computation, a method for simulating plasma.

This wiki covers the basics -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle-in-cell

Looking at your plot in the youtube link, it seems the simulation only represents a quarter of a slice through the whole device. Symmetry means the fields in the other three quadrants are just mirrors of the one calculated.

Not needed, but I captured one frame from your video and did the mirroring of the main plot window, so the field in the whole device would look like this.
PIC sim full.png
I assume the elapsing time as the video plays reflects actual time for the plasma to evolve in the chamber. Does the simulation give the actual time represented across the video?

I have one small question about the voltages. You said the chamber was at 60 kV. Looking at the sim plots, the two edges that seem to represent the chamber edges appear to always be at 50 kV. As the fields evolve some areas get up to 60 kV but those outside edges are still at 50 kV. Does this mean the external excitation voltage applied is 50 kV?

What software did you use to run this?

Thanks for sharing.
Rex Allers

User avatar
Carl Willis
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2001 11:33 pm
Real name: Carl Willis
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Contact:

Re: Joe Gayo's lab tour

Post by Carl Willis » Wed Jun 19, 2019 4:00 pm

Joe, this is a top-flight effort, and I am thrilled to see what appears to be a novel paradigm in fusor efficiency developing in your work.

The regime of high pressure, small electrodes, high potential, and high neutron yield is undoubtedly a new domain worthy of further attention.

Have you provided a detailed discussion of your electrode geometry on this board? I apologize if I missed it; I have mostly been away from the forums the last few years. But it's progress like this that will make me come back!

Thanks for sharing your impressive project here.

-Carl
Carl Willis
http://carlwillis.wordpress.com/
TEL: +1-505-412-3277

Joe Gayo
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:34 am
Real name: Joe Gayo
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Joe Gayo's lab tour

Post by Joe Gayo » Wed Jun 19, 2019 6:02 pm

@Rex Yes, in this simulation the applied potential difference is 50kV. You are correct about the symmetry of the simulation as well. The animation represents microseconds. The software is Starfish (https://www.particleincell.com/starfish/ - Free!)

@Carl Thanks! The electrode geometry is discussed in my lab tour video on YouTube. I'm constantly refining the electrode geometry based on simulation and testing. The next "knob" to turn will be material selection.

Jon Rosenstiel
Posts: 1370
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 5:30 am
Real name: Jon Rosenstiel
Location: Southern California

Re: Joe Gayo's lab tour

Post by Jon Rosenstiel » Thu Jun 20, 2019 9:08 pm

Joe,

Awesome work, and congrats on the ultra-mega neutron numbers, you are the man! After many, many years the baton has finally found a new home... about time! And you didn't just up the ante a little bit, you blew it to smithereens!

In your video you mention that your device's neutron output on axis with the plasma beam is about 2 times that of the neutron output measured at right angles to the beam. As your device is not truly isotropic in neutron output it may be more accurate to quantify neutron flux in neutrons/sq-cm/second.

Jon Rosenstiel

PS: Anyone have a foot or so of 4" x 4" 6061-T6 bar stock they wanna part with?

Post Reply