Hi there,
for two days now we have a working fusor, build at school for a science project. Working with basic equipment we didn't think it was possible but we did it. First trials were outstanding and the fusion seemed rather good. Having not changed a thing overnight, and turning it on again in the morning to film the proces for a presentation, it didn't look that great anymore. A lot of haze in the chamber, not a clear glowing grid/plasma, and a unexplainable glow at the vacuum point.
Our setup:
One of the firsts startups (not yet at full power):
Run of today, looks realy different, and we don't know what's wrong:
I hope you guys can help us out a bit, within our capabilities and knowledge.
Jos
working fusor, but flawed
- Dennis P Brown
- Posts: 3190
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 10:46 am
- Real name: Dennis Brown
Re: working fusor, but flawed
That last photo looks very much like a real fusor - color looks correct and if you are in the 5 - 15 micron range (where most fusors operate) one gets a uniform plasma discharge essentially like that in their chamber. I can detect jets as well. Not sure what you think it should look like.
- Richard Hull
- Moderator
- Posts: 15037
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
- Real name: Richard Hull
Re: working fusor, but flawed
If the gauge in the photo is your vacuum gauge, You really have no way to read your vacuum.
Richard Hull
Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
- Mark Rowley
- Posts: 909
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:20 am
- Real name: Mark Rowley
- Location: Sacramento California
- Contact:
Re: working fusor, but flawed
For a basic demo unit this appears to be fairly spot on. But as Richard stated, that vacuum gauge won't provide much of an accurate reading. Research and install a DV-6M (or similar) thermocouple gauge. Based on the poisser I think you are closer to 30-50 microns, possibly a tad higher.
Mark Rowley
Mark Rowley
Re: working fusor, but flawed
Thank you for the reply. We thought it should look more like the first picture, but then with plasma. We were put of by the haze that was present during last days run. Good to know we got it right. We have to present it today.Dennis P Brown wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 3:55 pm That last photo looks very much like a real fusor - color looks correct and if you are in the 5 - 15 micron range (where most fusors operate) one gets a uniform plasma discharge essentially like that in their chamber. I can detect jets as well. Not sure what you think it should look like.
Thanks Richard,Richard Hull wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:34 pm If the gauge in the photo is your vacuum gauge, You really have no way to read your vacuum.
Richard Hull
We have tested the vacuum in a differen setting with a acurate digital gauge. Didn´t get to use that during the tests, so for a global view on the vacuum we put that analog meter in the system.
Thank you Mark,Mark Rowley wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 9:51 pm For a basic demo unit this appears to be fairly spot on. But as Richard stated, that vacuum gauge won't provide much of an accurate reading. Research and install a DV-6M (or similar) thermocouple gauge. Based on the poisser I think you are closer to 30-50 microns, possibly a tad higher.
Mark Rowley
As i says before to Richard, we have tested the vacuum with a acurate digital gauge. Just couldn´t use that one during the runs (that gauge is part of a bigger, not mobile, vacuum setup). But it is good to know the fusor appears to function properly.