More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

This forum is for other possible methods for fusion such as Sonolumenescense, Cold Fusion, CANR/LENR or accelerator fusion. It should contain all theory, discussions and even construction and URLs related to "other than fusor, fusion".
Post Reply
Sbwavefarm
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:38 am
Real name:

More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Sbwavefarm »

Using Shockwave heating using Acoustical cavitation with Duterium and Acetone. Heated a small sample of 600 grams of liquid(mostly seawter) with a raise in temp. of 44 degrees F in 15 min. only used 8.8333 watts per min. and recieved 68.216320172 watts in Heat energy!

I could record the fusion reactions on my Giger tube, which jumped with each reaction and gama ray burst. Counts per Min went from 30 a MIN to about 300 a min.

I could hear a small change in sound with the (implosion) of each reaction and the resulting jump on the Geiger meter

Most exciting was an infared video I shot of the reactions(the reaction produces mostly IR light 50%) so visibly there wasn't much to see with just the human eye.

It does look like tiny supernovas. When visable mostly blue plasma.

The secret was the sauce. I added some metalic and organic compounds to the Fusion fuel.

sbwavefarm@yahoo.com

The reaction is REPRODUCABLE(several times that day alone)
The reaction is MEASURABLE (caloric heating value, Ifared, nuetron detection)
The reaction is OBSERVABLE (even to the naked eye at certain points)
Andrew Seltzman
Posts: 815
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2004 8:02 pm
Real name: Andrew Seltzman
Contact:

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Andrew Seltzman »

Attachments
trolls.jpg
Andrew Seltzman
www.rtftechnologies.org
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Chris Bradley »

> The reaction is REPRODUCABLE(several times that day alone)
> The reaction is MEASURABLE (caloric heating value, Ifared, nuetron detection)
> The reaction is OBSERVABLE (even to the naked eye at certain points)
and:
...The reaction is LETHAL (if it were nuclear fusion at the rates you suggest)

You'd be dead if the above claim of 60W of fusion energy were true.

QRT.
User avatar
Mike Beauford
Posts: 419
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:24 pm
Real name:
Location: Morton Grove, IL

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Mike Beauford »

I think you need to review what exactly your trying to explain to us here on this forum. If as you say you have generated 60 watts of fusion energy, as Chris has already mentioned, you would have received a lethal does of radiation and this should/will be your last post to this forum. Good luck with your medical care, my condolences to your family.
Mike Beauford
David Rosignoli
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 9:57 am
Real name: David Rosignoli

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by David Rosignoli »

Matthew,

I think before you quote excess energy gain, you need to do a few things:
1. Better explain your setup. How did you perform the test? How did you measure it? It is easy to get calorimetry measurements wrong. How do you know these were Gamma ray bursts?
2. There may be more conventional explanations to your results. For instance, we know single or multi bubble sonoluminenscence occurs during cavitation events. If you see blue plasma, you are likely seeing this with the frequency of the UV light emitted downshifted to the blue spectrum. There may be EM noise being generated in this process as a result. Just some speculation - but could this generate enough RF noise to foul up the geiger counter circuit itself? Without adequate shielding and using other means of detection, this would be a source of contention.

Of course, assuming you overcomb the hurdles and establish that this was real and non-chemical, then this would be a difference process altogether (Widom-Larson theory?) then what we see in a typical fusion reaction. As Chris has pointed out, too much radiation would be released.

Dave
User avatar
Dennis P Brown
Posts: 3159
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 10:46 am
Real name: Dennis Brown

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Dennis P Brown »

Mr Kramer,

by just the results you report and your number of significant decimal places I can deduce that your experimental methods are very imprecise. I can only conclude 1) you have never performed a rigorous scientific experiment in High School and 2) your technique is the sole source of the excessive energy that you are attributing to be due to thermo-nuclear fusion.

You would not be the first to confuse sample heating by your own heating method for nuclear release of energy.

How you are deriving the energy input needed to produce your shockwave is most likely your source of error. Also, another probable source was your addition of a fine metal power(s) in the acetone. Metals can and will 'burn' with oxygen when heated. Further, these metals can be highly reactive in an organic solvent containing deuterium and oxygen. Very possible you 'burned' the deuterium with oxygen and/or burned the fine metal with deuterium and/or oxygen (your deuterium gas is dissolved in the acetone as well as some oxygen from the air.)

I am not surprised you got net energy via a chemical reaction but am surprised you didn't get a fire or explosion.

First, off, you need to learn more about safety of chemical reactions; which also means you need to learn some chemistry. Deuterium gas (even dissolved) and fine metal powders are an extreme explosive hazard. Third, do at the very least, learn what significant digits are and how to report them in an experiment.

Best of luck.
User avatar
Carl Willis
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2001 7:33 pm
Real name: Carl Willis
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Contact:

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Carl Willis »

I agree with Andrew that this is probably trolling.

In any case, it falls far short of the burden of useful disclosure, and is full of unintelligible gobbledegook (what the hell are watts per minute??), as is typically the case whenever people come on here to claim massive energy releases from unknown contraptions.

-Carl
Carl Willis
http://carlwillis.wordpress.com/
TEL: +1-505-412-3277
Sbwavefarm
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:38 am
Real name:

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Sbwavefarm »

Writing from beyond the grave-due to my lethal radiation exposure-Ha ha ha....

Project Sherwood-The U.S. Program in Controlled Fusion, By Amasa S. Bishop @1958

Apendix II P. 177 LOW TEMPATURE FUSION
"If However the charge of one of the interacting particles could be effectively neutralized, the need for high tempatures would be obviated. A beautiful demonstration of this FACT was provided by the work of Alvarez, Brander , and others at the University of California at Berkely, who showed experimentally that fusion reactions can be produced at low tempatures with the aid of mu-mesons.

It's just us CALIFORNIANS like alternative energy.
I just followed in the foosteps of giants. Added my own special observations and materials and improved on thier design.

The 8.8333 watts in per min. is the total power from a ultrasonic transducer, producing shock waves(much like the Naval Rea. Labs did) to initiate fusion reactions at alot lower temps and higher P than your (Gaseous Fusors). It works by heating a moderator in liquid form to high heats in a short time. Its an older technology with new fuel made from a mix of hydrocarbons(renewably produced from algae) and the chemical componets of the carbon cycle in stars.

if you would like to get off your armchair, and do some good science. Then you can call 805-453-3960, or email sbwavefarm@yahoo.com I can walk you through the steps required.

Thanks for the comments and questions.

Yes its radioactive, but not like fission. Yet like Nuclear fusion power plants it heats water, which can be used to spin a turbine and produce electricity.

Its way cool, as we say out here, and yet definately Hot!!

I would like to thank the N.R.C for thier oversight and help.
If you have an emergency with your fusor you can call them at:301-816-5100

or if you have a concern/complaint at:
1-800-695-7403

"Education begins the gentleman, but reading, good company and reflection must finish him." John Locke 1632-1704
User avatar
Jim Kovalchick
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:00 pm
Real name:

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Jim Kovalchick »

If you are talking about the Nuclear Regulatory Commission when you say N.R.C., then you have revealed yet another falsehood in your story. The NRC has stated numerous times that they have no intent nor the mandate to regulate fusion. Of course, fusion isn't really what you are doing now is it?

NRC activity is a matter of public record. Please provide links to the regulatory documents supporting your claim of NRC assistance and oversight. By the way, while I'm not certain, making a false claim about assistance from a federal agency is probably a violation of some law somewhere. If you are looking for a government agency to help you, then might I suggest one or more of the many mental health agencies in your area.

Site admins: Are you leaving this thread open for entertainment value only? It is certainly inconsistent with normal level of discussion on this forum.
Sbwavefarm
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:38 am
Real name:

Dear Mr. Brown at the Navyheating−30°C to +45°C over a period of a few minutes.

Post by Sbwavefarm »

Your a bit rude for a naval officer, When the NRL was first involved in the Fusion program they made thier people work for at least FOUR MONTHS at a fusion lab so as to learn the science.

I did alot of experiemnting with girls in High School, and mostly programming computers. How many tracking cookies do you think are on this site from our "non friends):

Get your ass in a Jet and come over for a cup of coffee and then you can see it and www.prepguard.com just serviced my radiation detector. Its working perfectly. You cannot fake radiation. It is or it isn't

This is not sonolumineces,its fusion. If you had the proper security clearence then you wouldn't be such an Ahole and you would be asking more specific scientific questions.

My apparatus is quite diffrent from the schematics on this site. I use low power not high power to initiate the reaction.

My father, both grandfathers, and my great-grandfather were all naval pilots so I have great respect for the naval service. I have flown serval types of aircraft.

You should have more respect for your peers!

My math was sound. Although I used the ammount of energy for pure water at 4.186 Joules, not as acurate as I would like but I don't have the budget you do.You are just not educated enough yet so you responded with fear and scorn.


Are you not part of the "Green Fleet"?
I helped develop the ASTM renewable fuel standard for the F-18's and other naval equipment.

Prove me wrong-run the same thing in your lab and see what results you get. Don't take my word for it trust but verify.

You seem defensive? That's cause its fourth quarter and I am on offense.

"Neutrons were a scarce and expensive comodity, capable of beign produced by only a few countries. It was clear that the quick realization of a controled thermonuclear device would have appreciable millitary signifigance. This FACT alone constituted strong justification for carrying out the work on a classified basis."

I thought we were on the same team.
Stop trying to bully and intimidate me.(read fusor forum rules)

You can't get that much heat from a chemical reaction, But some guys in California did. They say its fusion too. Who is on your team?
Do you have a PhD from a national university?
I back UCLA any day of the week VS Navy, Basketball or fusion? want make a bet?

Mr. Matthew Kramer 805-453-3960

Dissmissed
Sbwavefarm
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:38 am
Real name:

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Sbwavefarm »

Call them.
I did mean the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
11545 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, MD 20852
User avatar
Mike Beauford
Posts: 419
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:24 pm
Real name:
Location: Morton Grove, IL

Re: Dear Mr. Brown at the Navyheating−30°C to +45°C over a period of a few minutes.

Post by Mike Beauford »

Hi Matthew,

Many people have claimed over unity, and no one to date has delivered! Forgive us for being skeptical. The one true measure is if you can use a bubble detector and it registers bubbles, then now we are talking. It's immune to EMI and if there are neutron's, it will show it. Search on the forums regarding BTI bubble detectors and it will all make sense.

Mike Beauford
Mike Beauford
Sbwavefarm
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:38 am
Real name:

Re: Dear Mr. Brown at the Navyheating−30°C to +45°C over a period of a few minutes.

Post by Sbwavefarm »

how much does that cost? a BTI

Do you have one I can send you my equipment fedex and lab notes
Sbwavefarm
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:38 am
Real name:

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Sbwavefarm »

Thanks for having an open mind.

Do you think its wise to disclose thermonuclear reaction data on an unsecure website?

I vote for no?
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Re: Dear Mr. Brown at the Navyheating−30°C to +45°C over a period of a few minutes.

Post by Chris Bradley »

Matthew Kramer wrote:
> I have flown serval types of aircraft. You should have more respect for your peers!
Which types, and where?
User avatar
Jim Kovalchick
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:00 pm
Real name:

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Jim Kovalchick »

Your response to my challenge was frivolous at best.

The NRC doesn't engage in consultation. They engage in licensing and regulatory activitites that are subject to public disclosure.

You should be able to point to specific documentation in their ADAMS system or through their web based public document room. Had you had official involvement by the NRC in your so-called project, there would be documentation of it available for anyone to see. What is the docket number of your project? Can you name anyone by name or title at the NRC with whom you have dealt?
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14991
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Richard Hull »

I hate leaping in on these worthless endeavors, but your reference to Project Sherwood and the contained note related to low temperature fusion did note that this was specifically related to muon induced fusion. You got some 100mev+ muons? If not, the reference is just so much flooby dust thrown into the air.

Do not change the tittle of a running thread.

This whole exercise is one of futility and we will never see a single watt of your "breakthrough project" do anything of commercial or social value as is the case with so many other limited knowledge claimants. Still, your efforts have resulted in about the same useful electrical output as those who have invested billions of our dollars in their fusion effort. They, however, get to be in the news due to their cachet and you won't.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Sbwavefarm
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:38 am
Real name:

the N.R.C. does lic. fusion reactors, and operators

Post by Sbwavefarm »

Only if your going commercial.

Comission paper sec 2 0090064 will be able to educate you -or call 817-200-1181

47 C this morning, take that UCLA! (CPM"S say radiation)

It is so great that they shutdown with the touch of a switch. No meltdowns.
WARNING it does produce radiation, and UV light DOES NOT effect the G/M tube.

Chemical, or Fusion reaction if you can heat water that fast you have a powerplant.

I hear the NRC HQ is in Maryland, one of several states without electricty.

Send your resume to sbwavefarm@yahoo.com if you have experience with permiting or building nuclear reactors. Building site is on 90 AC in California- Nevada City 95959 and will be grid connected.

What the heck isn't the rest of the country working on fusion or is it just the great Republic of California!

Carbon Dioxide is one of the major inputs. 9 watts of electricity per min. Hottest in CA

International Standards Orginization has an energy system cert. Probably do that as well. Measures inputs and outputs by a third party.
John Smith
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 5:42 pm
Real name:

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by John Smith »

Sorry to do it this way but I have to add to this hilarious discussion.

Mr. Kramer could you please also tells us more about your psychic powers (and the lab explosion).

http://www.dcavarretta.info/chips/about%20us.htm (Yes this it the same Matthew Kramer)
---
Matthew H Kramer
Psychic Medium

One of my first memories as a child was talking to a "ghost" of small girl named "Felecia" where I was born in Hartford, California. I graduated from Linfield College in Oregon. I currently work as a research chemist in Santa Barbara, and bring my scientific background to bear when using my "extra senses" to communicate with the departed. I record my impressions from a ghosts, and then try to verify it with historical and scientific evidence to prove it's truthfulness. I survived a very serious explosion in my laboratory several years ago that seemed to enhance my abilities. I see my ability as a way to resolve issues for the dead people that most cannot see and hear like I can. I was raised as a Catholic by my family, but I am not particularly religious, I appreciate all faiths, and I personally believe that energy cannot be destroyed, and only changes shape. We are all connected
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Re: the N.R.C. does lic. fusion reactors, and operators

Post by Chris Bradley »

Matthew Kramer wrote:
> 9 watts of electricity per min.
This basic error of confused units has already been pointed out to you.

It is clear that you are not prepared to take even the smallest modicum of interest in people's attempts to elevate your futile monotribe (...not even a diatribe...) into something intelligible. You've picked precisely the wrong place on the internet to try to get any traction with whatever it is you are fantasising about.

Damnant quod non intelligunt


(... well, his linkedIn says he speaks Latin too....)

....

I must confess to gaining a certain entertainment value in these occasional visitors, who all follow a very well defined protocol: first a claim lacking even self-consistent scientific elements, then more forcefully repeating it and implying anyone who doubts its veracity must be stupid, then saying how everyone else doesn't understand, then claiming their own (supposed) exaggerated skills, then predicting how the future will be changed by their fantastical endeavours and how everyone else is a numb-nuts.

To be fair, this one has added a new step to the usual formula and is now asking for resumes!

What interests me the most about such visitors is how they can come to be so deeply confused about the very basics of science. Clearly, something has gone very wrong in education/society that people can end up thinking that such material has a foundation in reality.
Sbwavefarm
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:38 am
Real name:

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- - 77 out

Post by Sbwavefarm »

Yes it is and how about yourself?

EXACTLY RIGHT

there is no possible way that I could have heated water that fast, and if I did there is no way it would be a "nuclear reactor" that would produce any kind of charged particle be that a neutron, grama ray, or Xray.

Ergo

I could not have built a "nuclear reactor" as i am currently charged with criminal penalties by the City of Santa Barbara. I am due in court in a few days.
Your expert opinions are priceless

Ubi pus, ibi evacua

NO way I could have done fission or fusion?
comments? lame comebacks?

Iridium
Sbwavefarm
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:38 am
Real name:

Re: the N.R.C. does lic. fusion reactors, and operators

Post by Sbwavefarm »

Nice to meet you to.


Its still fusion and it costs alot less to produce that must piss you off are these anger, or fustration spaeking



Give me your fedex adress and I'll send you the notes you should be able to do it in under 4 hours from set up to "fusion event"

Bring all the fancy instruments you want

I am throwing down the scientific glove sir!

I have to go to work.

Nice chating with you.
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Re: the N.R.C. does lic. fusion reactors, and operators

Post by Chris Bradley »

Matthew Kramer wrote:
> Bring all the fancy instruments you want
If someone has a BTI they would offer to sell you, would you agree to buy it, video it in real time next to a stop watch, and post the video up straight away to show the bubbles popping up? In fact, the bubbles will probably be quite audible - the thing should positively fizz into a froth in no time at all.

Would you agree not to post again until we can see that video? (after all, it should be a piece of cake?)
Andrew Seltzman
Posts: 815
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2004 8:02 pm
Real name: Andrew Seltzman
Contact:

Re: More Than Break even Reaction- one unit in - 7.7226023 out

Post by Andrew Seltzman »

Attachments
trolls.jpg
Andrew Seltzman
www.rtftechnologies.org
User avatar
Carl Willis
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2001 7:33 pm
Real name: Carl Willis
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Contact:

Thread is closed.

Post by Carl Willis »

Due to making no sense and not being a useful technical disclosure in line with our prevailing standards, I have closed this thread.

I'm sorry it took so long to get this thread under control. I'm in Kazakhstan and Internet availability isn't what I'm used to in the US.

-Carl
Carl Willis
http://carlwillis.wordpress.com/
TEL: +1-505-412-3277
Post Reply

Return to “Other Forms of Fusion - Theory, Construction, Discussion, URLs”