Galvanized Steel?

For posts specifically relating to fusor design, construction, and operation.
Post Reply
Logan Noel
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 6:15 pm
Real name: Logan Noel

Galvanized Steel?

Post by Logan Noel »

From everything that I've heard it is preferable to use stainless steel in fusor construction, but galvanized is simply quite easier to obtain. I'm wondering if anyone knows whether there would be any issues if I used galvanized instead of stainless?
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Re: Galvanized Steel?

Post by Chris Bradley »

The issue is zinc's vapour pressure.

Image
JohnCuthbert
Posts: 339
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 4:30 pm
Real name:

Re: Galvanized Steel?

Post by JohnCuthbert »

Really?
From that graph, if the stuff is at 200C it has a vapour pressure of something like 10^-6 torr and fusors typically have something like 10^-2 torr of D2 so you would have 0.01% Zn- which isn't great but if you keep the temperature below 100C the pressure drops below 10^-9 torr and I doubt that's a big problem . (You will have more than that much air leftover in many cases).

On the other hand, the Zn coating will oxidise and, in moist air it will trap water vapour so it will be a virtual leak.
I can't help thinking that the rough reactive surface of the zinc plating would be more of an issue than the vapour pressure per se.
Andrew Seltzman
Posts: 810
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2004 8:02 pm
Real name: Andrew Seltzman
Contact:

Re: Galvanized Steel?

Post by Andrew Seltzman »

Stainless hemispheres are easy to obtain and cheap:
http://www.sharpeproducts.com/store/hem ... genumber=2
Andrew Seltzman
www.rtftechnologies.org
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 15027
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Galvanized Steel?

Post by Richard Hull »

Idea.................Spend your money and your time and your effort to build a galvanized chamber. Experiment with your money and your time to prove this a wrong negative on our part.

The overall temperature of the device is meaningless in this discussion as there are a myriad of localized hot spots where ion and electron beams impact the shell. The overall shell temperature is a time ordered summation of these rather localized, intensely hot spots, minus what thermal convective transfer does to cool the large surface area of the shell.

There is a reason no scientific galvanized vacuum chambers exist where a plasma is present under a critically maintained vacuum.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
JohnCuthbert
Posts: 339
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 4:30 pm
Real name:

Re: Galvanized Steel?

Post by JohnCuthbert »

It's an interesting idea, but wouldn't answer the question. There's no doubt that galvanised steel would be a poor choice.
The point I raised was that it's not clear if it's poor because zinc is volatile (and, at low temperatures, it's not) or if the issue is the fact that, on exposure to air, the zinc forms a mixed carbonate/ hydroxide layer that would outgas like crazy.
Post Reply

Return to “Fusor Construction & Operation (& FAQs)”