Hi Aidan. Thank you for sticking with the unsolicited lesson.
You got 4 a, b, and c right this time.
But your final answer, the associated volume of D2 gas, is still wrong by a factor of more than 100.
In real life it's numerical answers that matter.
Please give it one more try, and perhaps show your work.
Beware of mixing up units, such as grams and kilograms.
* mass of deuterium in 1 liter of liquid D2O.
* mass of deuterium in 1 liter of gaseous D2.
* ratio of the two previous answers. Do you see how that's the same as the volume ratio
between portions of the two substances containing the same mass of deuterium element?
Express the result either way: amount of D2O consumed to make 1 liter of D2 gas,
or amount of D2 gas that could be evolved from 1 liter of D2O liquid.
-Rich
Deuterium Amount
- Rich Feldman
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:59 pm
- Real name: Rich Feldman
- Location: Santa Clara County, CA, USA
Re: Deuterium Amount
All models are wrong; some models are useful. -- George Box
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:45 pm
- Real name: Charlie McCartney
- Location: Dallas, Texas, U.S.A.
- Contact:
Re: Deuterium Amount
All of this is covered in high school chemistry, it is just a matter of explaining the proper way to convert these units.
- Richard Hull
- Moderator
- Posts: 15032
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
- Real name: Richard Hull
Re: Deuterium Amount
A mole of heavy water is only 20 grams, ~ 20cc. If fully electrolyized that would make ~44 liters of D2 gas.
The last time I checked 100 cc of heavy water was about $65.00. If fully electrolyized, that's about 220 liters of D2 gas. The cost of that much bottled D2 would be well over $1000.00.
Still, electrolyizing is a process filled with purity issues when it comes to putting the gas into the chamber, but it can definitely be made to work.
Were I to do it. I would have the D2 gas go through dryerite first and finally through a 10 foot coil of copper tubing under LN2 before admitting it.
Richard Hull
The last time I checked 100 cc of heavy water was about $65.00. If fully electrolyized, that's about 220 liters of D2 gas. The cost of that much bottled D2 would be well over $1000.00.
Still, electrolyizing is a process filled with purity issues when it comes to putting the gas into the chamber, but it can definitely be made to work.
Were I to do it. I would have the D2 gas go through dryerite first and finally through a 10 foot coil of copper tubing under LN2 before admitting it.
Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
- Rich Feldman
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:59 pm
- Real name: Rich Feldman
- Location: Santa Clara County, CA, USA
Re: Deuterium Amount
Oops, Richard, you had two values wrong, one by a factor of two.
Here with corrections:
A mole of heavy water is only 20 grams, ~ 18cc. If fully electrolyzed that would make 1 mole = 22.4 liters of D2 gas at STP.
Perhaps your analysis was remembered from long ago, and overlooked the diatomic nature of hydrogen gases.
100 grams of heavy water (only 90 ml, that's why it's called heavy)
would yield about 110 liters of deuterium gas.
That's consistent with the volume ratio I was leading Aidan to, using looked-up densities instead of having to learn about moles.
Here with corrections:
A mole of heavy water is only 20 grams, ~ 18cc. If fully electrolyzed that would make 1 mole = 22.4 liters of D2 gas at STP.
Perhaps your analysis was remembered from long ago, and overlooked the diatomic nature of hydrogen gases.
100 grams of heavy water (only 90 ml, that's why it's called heavy)
would yield about 110 liters of deuterium gas.
That's consistent with the volume ratio I was leading Aidan to, using looked-up densities instead of having to learn about moles.
- Attachments
-
- mole.jpg (4.72 KiB) Viewed 3859 times
All models are wrong; some models are useful. -- George Box
- Richard Hull
- Moderator
- Posts: 15032
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
- Real name: Richard Hull
Re: Deuterium Amount
Thanks for the correction. that's the kind of normal mistake I make when playing chemistry. I forgot about the mass of the neutron in the D....and with me loving neutrons...Go figure.
I think the upshot for both of us, in this thread, is to show any would-be "roll your own D2" person that there is a heck of a lot of D2 gas at STP in 100CC of fully electrolyized heavy water.
Richard Hull
I think the upshot for both of us, in this thread, is to show any would-be "roll your own D2" person that there is a heck of a lot of D2 gas at STP in 100CC of fully electrolyized heavy water.
Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment