North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Reflections on fusion history, current events, and predictions for the 'fusion powered future.
Post Reply
User avatar
Mark Rowley
Posts: 908
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:20 am
Real name: Mark Rowley
Location: Sacramento California
Contact:

North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by Mark Rowley »

How much you want to bet they built a Fusor !

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... wD9FL3VKO0
User avatar
Doug Coulter
Posts: 1312
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:18 pm
Real name: Doug Coulter
Location: Floyd, VA, USA
Contact:

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by Doug Coulter »

I wouldn't make that bet because that is probably what they did, despite making claims they "invented it all on their own". The South Korean guy is a typical example of the nay sayers who think tokomaks are the only way, interestingly -- saying they can't have done that (which is probably right, they probably didn't make a tokomak). Many here can claim to have made fusion at all, and I note that even the N Koreans aren't claiming things like gain or even high Q. Heck, if you go with DPF (Lerner's thing though he didn't invent that) it sure doesn't take very much -- even less than a fusor does.

I bet many people here have done more "inventing on their own" than all of N Korea has. It just doesn't tend to happen on our revered leaders Bday (do we have a revered leader?).
Why guess when you can know? Measure!
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14975
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by Richard Hull »

Bottom line.........No one has lit a single, simple .01 watt LED with fusion energy derived from the expenditure of less than .01 watts input yet and are not likely to in the near future (many years).

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by Chris Bradley »

The future always holds what you least expect.

Omnia mutantur nos et mutamur in illis.
lutzhoffman
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 8:59 pm
Real name:

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by lutzhoffman »

Who knows what the NK government is spinning now on fusion, this said they do have many bright and intelligent individuals, so the possibility of something significant is always there.

So if you are looking for an interesting trip to a very unique place: Maybe offer to do some consulting for them, in exchange for air fare, room and board. Who knows maybe they will let you take something interesting home, like a nice portrait of the great leader.

This whole thing reminds me of China spending close to a billion dollars to put a man in space a few years back. Durring that same week a private group of people tested Space Ship One, and did the same thing for only 2 million in the California desert, plus they could re-use their spacecraft : ) The propaganda however worked with 24/7 domestic coverage of the Chinese rocket on their TV, with no mention of Space Ship One.

What this shows is that governments in general are often motivated more by propaganda, than they are by pursuit of real science.
Brett
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 1:25 pm
Real name:

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by Brett »

Schedule an above ground hydrogen bomb test, and I'll show up with an LED and solar cell, and accomplish just that.

Fusion break even was an accomplished fact decades ago. It's just that the fuel pellets are inconveniently large. Nothing we couldn't build a plant to handle *if we had to*. The subsequent history of fusion has been a battle to accomplish on a small, steady state scale something that really wants to be big and sudden.
Chris Roberts
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:35 pm
Real name: Chris Roberts

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by Chris Roberts »

"Fusion break even was an accomplished fact decades ago. It's just that the fuel pellets are inconveniently large."

Hah, well said indeed! I will have to write that one down.

I remember reading a story in a book called "The curve of binding energy" where Ted Taylor, one of the nuclear scientists of the era, set up a parabolic mirror during one of the nuclear tests. When the bomb went off, lots of light was focused by the mirror, and the guy lit a cigarette with a nuclear bomb... Call that a "proof of concept" if you wish. (Granted, the device being tested was purely fission, but a thermonuclear would do the job just as well)

-Chris
tligon
Posts: 587
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 1:58 pm
Real name:
Contact:

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by tligon »

I expect that's exactly what they did, built a fusor. This means they've almost caught up with high school kids and hobbyists in the free world!
User avatar
Mark Rowley
Posts: 908
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:20 am
Real name: Mark Rowley
Location: Sacramento California
Contact:

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by Mark Rowley »

My point exactly Tom. They have been reinventing the wheel for almost 60 years.
tligon
Posts: 587
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 1:58 pm
Real name:
Contact:

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by tligon »

I just bought a set of ConFlat rings for my fusor, and had to state on the order that I am not sending them overseas.

Well, I'm not. And I'm Com-Sec briefed so I can't say I'm ignorant if I do. But I sincerely hope the North Koreans, the Iranians, and all the other troublemakers out there don't make life difficult for fusioneers. As Richard likes to point out, we're pretty harmless, can't even power an LED.
MarkS
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 4:07 am
Real name:

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by MarkS »

In the spirit of the of the thread...
It'd take 10^11 2.4MeV Neutrons to light up a 3V / 20mA LED, and running a really smoking fusor at 10^7 N/s for a few hours one could power an LED for a second or so!
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14975
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by Richard Hull »

The whole fusion biz, as commonly yapped about in the press, relates to real power to the real electric mains, 24-7, no let up, no failures, etc. and operated at a profit significant enough to interest hard nosed power/energy people and their appointed bean counters...... It just isn't happening in my life time and probably not for anyone else here who is able to read. Yet, the carrot still dangles in front of a lot of donkey's faces. The hope is that one of them "becquerels" onto something at some point.

It doesn't seem that noodling it out has done much but warranted that several generations of well paid donkeys could send their offspring to the better schools in hopes of taking over chasing the carrot that dear old dad snapped at. Sort of like being born in the coal belt. There is only one paying job and it, seemingly, will never go away.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by Chris Bradley »

Richard Hull wrote:
> It doesn't seem that noodling it out has done much but warranted that several generations of well paid donkeys could send their offspring to the better schools in hopes of taking over chasing the carrot that dear old dad snapped at. Sort of like being born in the coal belt. There is only one paying job and it, seemingly, will never go away.
Richard; when you refer to carrots and donkeys, it sounds like you are saying people are asses for trying. I am not sure if you are trying to say that people shouldn't bother trying to take steps towards what they believe might be the means for viable controlled net fusion power, or whether your 'asinine' references are specifically aimed at the press and their overblown hyperbole.

Do you think people should try but should keep quiet about it (which'd probably mean they will need to do it all and fund it all on their own as there's never fund$ without publicity) or just not try as it will never happen for anyone, ever?

I've never been quite sure of your message as you seem to think it might happen in the future. But unless people are busying themselves to the task then it can't happen by itself!

Would you ever join a chorus of approval if anyone were to ever take a step towards fusion, or is the only step you think is worth taking is to go straight from nothing to power-station in one go? What intermediate steps would you think "ah, at last, progress"?..

I'm not talking about this NK announcement - which we can trust is, indeed, hyperbole. But I'm just interested in where you stand on the future for net fusion power and whether anyone could avoid your scorn by approaching the challenge of net-fusion power in some particular way that you think is neither foolhardy, self-serving, nor laughable.
User avatar
Rich Feldman
Posts: 1470
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:59 pm
Real name: Rich Feldman
Location: Santa Clara County, CA, USA

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by Rich Feldman »

lutzhoffman wrote:
> This whole thing reminds me of China spending close to a billion dollars to put a man in space a few years back. Durring that same week a private group of people tested Space Ship One, and did the same thing for only 2 million in the California desert, plus they could re-use their spacecraft : )

Sorry, can't let that slip by. Putting 1 pound into Earth orbit takes at least 25 times as much energy as launching 1 pound into "space" (at 100 km) for a minute or two.

By national space agency standards, the Ansari X prize bar was set pretty low. If you will allow me a bit of poetic license, it's like fusion in the garage vs. in tokamaks and NIF.

-Rich

p.s. the HARP gun could propel 400 pound projectiles up to 180 km in the 1960's, for a few thousand dollars a shot.
All models are wrong; some models are useful. -- George Box
John Futter
Posts: 1848
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 10:29 pm
Real name: John Futter
Contact:

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by John Futter »

Using the non existent data from North Korea
and reversing the polarity in my non existent fusor so that neutrons and high voltage input give the reciprocal of what we normally get

I can confirm that Kim Jong Il or any of his daughter products did not appear, and my back yard appears to be free of North Korea.


Seriously do we have to take up bandwidth on this????????????
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14975
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: North Korea Claims to Achieve Elusive Nuclear Fusion

Post by Richard Hull »

In answer to Chris' questions to me......

It relates more to the more obvious, (in the U.S.), need for occasional press hypes that fusion is on the move, which it is really not. Add to this the normal press reports failing to give meaningful specifics and you have what amounts to a feel good press report of little or no real substance designed by the fusion P.R. people as a "keep alive" for funding and the ever present promise of fusion energy. Coupled with these press reports is the release of no new real progress data or info from the scientific side in the form of what one might charitably call progress.

Everything is political in this day and age, even in science, at all but the nitty gritty level.

Next, what is progress worth speaking of? I mean, really speaking of that can lift fusion's dream above its current sleep walking state.

Real progress is utterly simple and that is, sustained, over unity fusion.....But this begs the question; over what interval?.... For a minute?.... For an hour? It depends on your perspective. If you are used to 100usec sustains before the wall ablation fouls the environment then a minute is a marvelous achievement and the P.R. department is kicked into high gear with the success reports. At an hour sustain, will they swear that fusion power to the people is just around the bend! Again!

What will the above really mean if, after the one hour run, the entire chamber is damaged and a 5 week rework is needed for the next 1.2 hour run. How close are we then?

I guess I'll get excited when the power utilities get excited at the prospect of actually building a fusion power plant. Then we will be only 10 years out from a replay of the 1957 Shipping Port power plant fission reality.

What does it take for me to be happy? Probably what I saw in Life magazine in the early 50's where a woman is at an electric stove in her little apron cooking with one of the early ugly black nuclear sub fission, test bed reactors in the background powering that stove and her cooking efforts. We were, at that time, still about 5 years from Shipping Port in Pennsylvania going on line, but that broad was cookin' due to the conversion of fission energy to electrical power! Cheezy, cheap publicity stunt? You bet......Real electrical energy from fission? You bet. Let me see this cheesy assed fusion demo publicity stunt with a fusion reactor in the background and for me, Fusion power will be just around the bend. Until that time, fusion is as dead in the water as fish floating in Love canal.

"Lucky donkey", "donkey", etc., is no aspersion cast at the researchers or their efforts, it is just that, like the carroted donkey, they move forward on dream power and not a reasonable foreseeable reality of getting the carrot plodding, as they do, on long established paths, "bull heading" at the carrot with ever greater lunges at it. It will be the lucky donkey that Becquerels onto the solution, snapping the carrot and victory from the jaws of long heralded defeat.

For me, fusion is politics in science played at a current iteration honed over many years of what one might wish to term progress into a full fledged, self-perpetuating hegemony over the "idea" of future energy abundances touted to be un-ending due to our seawater reserves of fusion fuel. It's a goin' concern, a gambit that plays well off so many aspects of itself and the hopes and dreams of everyone from joe public to the degreed scientist imersed within it.

Oh it will happen, sure, but for me, we are not even close to the end of the beginning of the effort, if not rolling down a complete blind alley...............Unless, as I have always contended, that "the lucky donkey", that meandering, well meaning, misguided, Becquerel already walks among us.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Post Reply

Return to “Fusion --- Past, Present, and Future”