Transform your fusor in thruster, for a second life
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:47 am
- Real name: Patrick Lindecker
- Location: Maisons-Alfort France
Transform your fusor in thruster, for a second life
Hello,
Here is an interesting paper called "Breakthrough of Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Concept for Advanced Space Propulsion"
at: http://www.irs.uni-stuttgart".de/publikationen/IRS_Publikationen_Dateien/IAC-18C47-C3.512x47993_final.pdf
Patrick Lindecker
Here is an interesting paper called "Breakthrough of Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Concept for Advanced Space Propulsion"
at: http://www.irs.uni-stuttgart".de/publikationen/IRS_Publikationen_Dateien/IAC-18C47-C3.512x47993_final.pdf
Patrick Lindecker
Re: Transform your fusor in thruster, for a second life
Link has a typo. Should be:
http://www.irs.uni-stuttgart.de/publika ... _final.pdf
http://www.irs.uni-stuttgart.de/publika ... _final.pdf
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:47 am
- Real name: Patrick Lindecker
- Location: Maisons-Alfort France
Re: Transform your fusor in thruster, for a second life
>Link has a typo
Yes you are right. TKS.
Yes you are right. TKS.
Re: Transform your fusor in thruster, for a second life
Und jetz die link ist kaput.
------
The less you bet, the more you lose when you win.
The less you bet, the more you lose when you win.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2017 7:11 am
- Real name: Justin Fozzard
- Location: Essex, England
- Richard Hull
- Moderator
- Posts: 15024
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
- Real name: Richard Hull
Re: Transform your fusor in thruster, for a second life
I think Miley or his group obtained some patents for space propulsion use of the fusor concept years ago. Lotta' good it did. Like most patents they languish and the specifics die on the vine. Others develop and think around the patent and get their patents and the clock usually runs out on them as well.
Richard Hull
Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
- Bob Reite
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:03 pm
- Real name: Bob Reite
- Location: Wilkes Barre/Scranton area
Re: Transform your fusor in thruster, for a second life
Someone once joked that a patent is a license to go to court (over patent infringement).
The more reactive the materials, the more spectacular the failures.
The testing isn't over until the prototype is destroyed.
The testing isn't over until the prototype is destroyed.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 2:26 pm
- Real name: Frank Sanns
Re: Transform your fusor in thruster, for a second life
Early on in life, I did a calculation that says it is impossible to go to the stars. Even the nearest.
The nearest start is around 4 light years away. That is really close by stellar distances. To get there in a few generations, say 100 years, how could it be done?
The simple equation for kinetic energy reveals why it is impossible. KE=1/2 mv^2. Put in 1/25th the speed of light to get there in 100 year. Use the mass of a very small ship like the space shuttle at launch 2x10^6 kg and you get an energy needed of 1.5x 10^20 Joules. This number is equal to the WORLD energy use for an entire year.
Excluded was the extra weight of the fuel, time to accelerate, and deceleration energy and time required.
With all of the extra mass needed to accelerate a tiny craft like the space shuttle to get there in 100 years, it is clear that going faster with any kind of drive engine is futile as my calculations were based on 100% conversion of fuel energy into velocity.
We are stuck on this water planet save for possible trips to the nearest of the planets no matter what the source of fuel is, even nuclear or antimatter.
The nearest start is around 4 light years away. That is really close by stellar distances. To get there in a few generations, say 100 years, how could it be done?
The simple equation for kinetic energy reveals why it is impossible. KE=1/2 mv^2. Put in 1/25th the speed of light to get there in 100 year. Use the mass of a very small ship like the space shuttle at launch 2x10^6 kg and you get an energy needed of 1.5x 10^20 Joules. This number is equal to the WORLD energy use for an entire year.
Excluded was the extra weight of the fuel, time to accelerate, and deceleration energy and time required.
With all of the extra mass needed to accelerate a tiny craft like the space shuttle to get there in 100 years, it is clear that going faster with any kind of drive engine is futile as my calculations were based on 100% conversion of fuel energy into velocity.
We are stuck on this water planet save for possible trips to the nearest of the planets no matter what the source of fuel is, even nuclear or antimatter.
Achiever's madness; when enough is still not enough. ---FS
We have to stop looking at the world through our physical eyes. The universe is NOT what we see. It is the quantum world that is real. The rest is just an electron illusion. ---FS
We have to stop looking at the world through our physical eyes. The universe is NOT what we see. It is the quantum world that is real. The rest is just an electron illusion. ---FS
- Richard Hull
- Moderator
- Posts: 15024
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
- Real name: Richard Hull
Re: Transform your fusor in thruster, for a second life
Frank, I agree! I would think that even the meanest intelligence trained in only a modicum of physics doing what you did at a tender age would have to agree. I did the same but in late high school as part of my "rocket club" musings. At a continuous 1 g acceleration to the mid point, followed by a 1 g deceleration. Makes a nice earth like gravity all the way there and it would be very doable save for the energy needed over the entire trip to make it comfortable. Then there is the mass of the ship, the supplies and water needed to sustain the crew. All un-doable.
I loved the movie "passengers", the ship was equipped with a thought for hitting space junk at sub light speeds. Unfortunately the mass and numbers of the junk was a bit overwhelming for their "shield"....
Richard Hull.
I loved the movie "passengers", the ship was equipped with a thought for hitting space junk at sub light speeds. Unfortunately the mass and numbers of the junk was a bit overwhelming for their "shield"....
Richard Hull.
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment