Archived - New X-ray Detector

Current images of fusor efforts, components, etc. Try to continuously update from your name, a current photo using edit function. Title post with your name once only. Change image and text as needed. See first posting for details.
Post Reply
Jon Rosenstiel
Posts: 1494
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 1:30 am
Real name: Jon Rosenstiel
Location: Southern California

Archived - New X-ray Detector

Post by Jon Rosenstiel »

Ran across this unit on eBay, new, still in the crate. An EDAX 10mm^2 Si(Li) CDU (Compact Detector Unit). Originally made to mount on an Amray scanning electron microscope.

I attached a couple of graphs showing the resolution difference between the EDAX detector and my old Ortec detector. The EDAX comes in at 150 eV FWHM on the 6.4 keV Ka x-ray of Fe. (She'll do FWHM of 136.9 eV on the 5.9 keV Mn x-ray) The Ortec can only manage 403 eV on the same source. Originally (maybe 30 years ago) the Ortec would have been a close match for the EDAX, but over the years repeated temperature cycling has taken its toll on a Si(Li) detector that was not made to be temperature cycled. The considerably more modern EDAX detector element will handle repeated temperature cycling. (That's good for me)!

Anyway, had to show off my new toy...

Jon Rosenstiel

[attachment=2]EDAX, Co-57.jpg[/attachment]
[attachment=1]EDAX spec.gif[/attachment][attachment=0]Ortec spec.gif[/attachment]
Attachments
Ortec spec.gif
EDAX spec.gif
EDAX, Co-57.jpg
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 15039
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: New X-ray Detector

Post by Richard Hull »

Very sweet! I am very envious. You are set up for looking at XRF stuff.

The basement o' x-rays.

Thanks for sharing this with us.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Starfire
Posts: 1482
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2001 2:14 pm
Real name:

Re: New X-ray Detector

Post by Starfire »

what can I say Jon -- Drool!
Jon Rosenstiel
Posts: 1494
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 1:30 am
Real name: Jon Rosenstiel
Location: Southern California

Re: New X-ray Detector

Post by Jon Rosenstiel »

Only problem having something like this is.... it makes me want to throw rocks at my NaI detector!

Jon Rosenstiel
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 15039
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: New X-ray Detector

Post by Richard Hull »

Will this thing track up into the 0.1-3mev range like a NaI detector will?

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Jon Rosenstiel
Posts: 1494
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 1:30 am
Real name: Jon Rosenstiel
Location: Southern California

Re: New X-ray Detector

Post by Jon Rosenstiel »

Richard Hull wrote:
> Will this thing track up into the 0.1-3mev range like a NaI detector will?

No, it starts to peter out around 40 keV. What I was refering to was it's resolution, stability and linearity.

Jon Rosenstiel
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 15039
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: New X-ray Detector

Post by Richard Hull »

You bet! That is what I thought. That is the key with low end X-ray spectro work. Some of the lines sit on top of one another for various elements in XRF and 400ev is a wide line!

NaI is happy with a 10kev line width at 200kev. One needs a Ge-Li detector to get sharp, narrow lines out to 6 mev.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Post Reply

Return to “Images du Jour”