Recent Review of cold fusion

This forum is for other possible methods for fusion such as Sonolumenescense, Cold Fusion, CANR/LENR or accelerator fusion. It should contain all theory, discussions and even construction and URLs related to "other than fusor, fusion".
Post Reply
hjerald1
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:28 am
Real name:

Recent Review of cold fusion

Post by hjerald1 »

This peer-reviewed article by Ed Storms is probably the most up-to-date scientific summary of the subject.
Probably worth reading by both proponents and non-believers.

"Status of Cold Fusion (2010)", Naturwissenschafften 97(10), 861-881 (2010)

For those who do not have access to the primary journal, a preprint is here:

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEstatusofcoa.pdf


Jerry
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Re: Recent Review of cold fusion

Post by Chris Bradley »

I cannot help myself from bristling when I read someone's claim that D+D->4He is a "plausible theory". Is it really a plausible reaction, with no gamma radiation in evidence coming from it?
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 15039
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Recent Review of cold fusion

Post by Richard Hull »

Storms is a cool and rational head. He is a retired ex-researcher from Los Alamos and has been in the CANR-LENR biz about as long as anyone. It is to be remembered that this is a synopsis and not a formal paper. Storms is pretty good at this sort of collection of bits and pieces into a simple review.

I have not had time to read it yet.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Re: Recent Review of cold fusion

Post by Chris Bradley »

I would concede that Storms may well be a rational head *in respect of other fusion energy researchers*, but it seems an odd bunch of folks that seek this dream. Newton himself could not resist a similar mass pursuit of his age, alchemy, and spent his dying days in isolation experimenting.

A book I am reading at the moment sums it up;

"The Undergrowth of Science (Delusion, Self-deception, and Human Frailty)", Gratzer
>"... the man who discovers how [fusion energy] is done would be adulated by generations to come as mankind's greatest benefactor. The rewards are ample and the prospects sufficient, as the cold-fusion aberration showed, to unhinge the keenest intellect."

Since the very first days of fusion this has been the case. It was Sir George Thomson who declared fusion power was only 20 years away, in 1958 [and unwittingly created the joke ...]. The mightiest of names have lent an excess of their passion and hope to the quest for fusion energy, and none who do so remain entirely objective about it. Anyone who passes those gates needs to know that their perceptions of things will become illusory.

FYI: I also came across a presentation from Storms; http://research.missouri.edu/vcr_seminar/Storms.ppt .
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 15039
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Recent Review of cold fusion

Post by Richard Hull »

If I only had a dollar for each pronouncement of fusion real soon now, hot or cold, I could retire tomorrow. The media tends to hype the hot as hot has the budget to employ mouthpieces. Cold has to sell itself by town crying and internet hype.

I have lived long enough to give up all hope. Just markin' time 'til the big sleep or some lucky donkey hits one outta' th' park.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Post Reply

Return to “Other Forms of Fusion - Theory, Construction, Discussion, URLs”