New advancements in sono-fusion

[ebeuerle]

Since New Scientist is password protecting certain articles here the complete text:

<Article>
THE idea that nuclear fusion can occur inside bubbles created by bombarding fluids with sound waves has received a boost. Temperatures inside such bubbles are far higher than previously thought, bringing them closer to the conditions required for fusion.

At the heart of "bubble fusion" is something called sonoluminescence: blast a fluid with powerful sound waves and you can cause bubbles to appear and then collapse in a blaze of light (New Scientist, 22 January, p 38). In 2002, a group of physicists at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee controversially claimed to have found the first evidence of fusion taking place inside these bubbles.

Critics said the light produced by these bubbles indicated the temperature inside was only 10,000 kelvin, nowhere near the 10 million kelvin required for fusion. But it turns out that these light measurements tell only half the story. "When you measure the temperature of the sun you find it is 7000 kelvin because you only see its cool outer surface. The core is opaque," says Larry Crum, an expert on sonoluminescence at the University of Washington in Seattle. Similarly, light from bubbles might only be revealing their surface temperature.

Now David Flannigan and Ken Suslick at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign have detected signs of much higher temperatures deep inside collapsing bubbles. The bubbles were created in a beaker of sulphuric acid and produced the most intense sonoluminescence ever recorded. This allowed the scientists to analyse the spectrum of light from the core of the bubbles for the first time. They say the light carries the characteristic signature of exotic ions such as positively charged oxygen that can form only in a plasma at temperatures of around 200,000 kelvin (Nature, vol 434, p 52).

Crum believes that, like the sun, the bubbles may hide even higher temperatures. "So maybe [bubble] fusion is technically possible," he says.
</Article>

-Eddie B.

[davidtrimmell]

I have the original PDF of the article here if anyone wants it:

http://66.78.90.30/energy/Single-bubble ... scence.pdf

Regards,

David Trimmell

[ebeuerle]

Ahh excellent David!!!! Thanks!
-Eddie B.

[Richard Hull]

As many of you know from past posts, I am open and friendly with the concepts of Bubble/sonosfusion, CF and CANR/LENR.
This is mostly because there is a body of evidence that, while shakey, is just too prevalent in the literature to ignore outright.

Bubble fusion, of course, at least has the respectability, AT PRESENT, to claim the hot fusion moniker. Thus it might claw its way in the back door well ahead of CF if things pan out with further work.

Richard Hull

[JohnCuthbert]

I'm not sure that the new discovery is any better than CF (other than having slightly better science credentials).
Did anyone else see this TV show?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/program ... mary.shtml

[Paul_Schatzkin]

>>>The star in a jar effortlessly reaches temperatures of tens of thousands of degrees, hotter than the surface of the sun.<<<

Ah, maybe that would explain why it's so cold today in Tennessee....

--PS