Canberra ND584 MCA NIM ?

This area is for discussions involving any fusion related radiation metrology issues. Neutrons are the key signature of fusion, but other radiations are of interest to the amateur fusioneer as well.
Post Reply
ChrisSmolinski
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 2:46 pm
Real name:
Contact:

Canberra ND584 MCA NIM ?

Post by ChrisSmolinski »

Does anyone know anything about this beast? I've done some web
searches, but can't seem to find any info. I have a line on one (an ebay
seller who didn't meet reserve for his), but it would be a bear to play with,
without any pinouts. It might be a bear to play with even *with* pinouts.
Richard Hester
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2001 12:07 am
Real name:

Re: Canberra ND584 MCA NIM ?

Post by Richard Hester »

You might try Canberra themselves or Don Orie at Oetech for documentation on this MCA. From experience, however, Canberra is not too keen on providing documentation for what they consider obsolete devices. If they have said data ( that's sometimes a BIG if), they will charge an arm and a leg. Don is more reasonable if he happens to have the documentation.

As a second thought, the ND prefix on the part number might mean that this an old Nuclear Data module taken over by Canberra. In that case, it's probably really ancient.
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 15026
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Canberra ND584 MCA NIM ?

Post by Richard Hull »

ND prefix is indeed old Nuclear Data Corp. Recognized by the the dull green, nearly olive drab front bezel, they are very obsolete and all attempts by myself to get data on these has met with abject failure. I have several NIM modules by NDC most are obvious in function (SCA, dual amp, fast integrator, etc) and easily usable, however a really nice 100mhz ADC I have by them is forever a mystery.

ADC's are the real heart of a full blown MCA. Unfortunately, most manufacturers went out of their way, tripping over themselves, to hide, obfuscate and confound any attempt by even the adroit to decode their often weird and nonesensical handshakes to make the things go. Even with a printed schematic and discription of the circuit's operation would often demand a herculean effort to interface the device.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Post Reply

Return to “Neutrons, Radiation, and Detection (& FAQs)”