Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

This area is for discussions involving any fusion related radiation metrology issues. Neutrons are the key signature of fusion, but other radiations are of interest to the amateur fusioneer as well.
User avatar
Mark Rowley
Posts: 909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:20 am
Real name: Mark Rowley
Location: Sacramento California
Contact:

Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Mark Rowley »

Restoring old scintillators and Geiger counters has been a hobby for quite a few years and resulted in quite the assemblage of ancient yet operational detectors.

Being the case, I decided to take a dusty 1st generation Ludlum Model 3 analog meter and pair it up with a $50 Soviet CHM11 boron type neutron detector (I bought the Ludlum for $100 several years ago).

The only prep work I completed was adjusting the voltage from 900v to Corona Mode voltage of around 750v.

First test with hot radium and gummite sources showed total gamma rejection. Second test with a weak AmBe source gave me the expected ~15cpm.

I then briefly fired up the Fusor for a quick and dirty run of about 173k isotropic n/s (evidenced by 5 BTI bubs in 150 seconds).

During that run, the Ludlum passed the test by detecting neutrons at the expected voltage of near 20kV. At 32kV I let the neuts click away on the Model 3 until I removed the boron tube from the paraffin moderator. Conducted this back and forth test several times with consistent results. At 32kV, xrays were present and were not detected by the tube.

Tbh, I expected this to work but was totally surprised byits simplistic / turnkey ease of operation.

The Model 3 is obviously not a digitally timed ratemeter but one can still be confident with its ability to register via the dial meter and audible clicks.

At least for beginners, this arrangement could be an easy way to keep the costs down and have a viable and simple to assemble neutron detection system.

Mark Rowley
Lukas Springer
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 4:37 pm
Real name: Lukas Springer
Contact:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Lukas Springer »

I'm a bit surprised your ludlum managed to detect the events, in my experience the model 3 need a small notification for a lower trigger.
Also 750V is not the "Corona mode voltage", but only the ignition voltage, meaning that the detector is in corona discharge *above* that voltage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwrPYnFZ0ps

This was my attempt at your experiment a couple of years ago, worked just fine!
User avatar
Mark Rowley
Posts: 909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:20 am
Real name: Mark Rowley
Location: Sacramento California
Contact:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Mark Rowley »

Good point on the technical side of where ignition and corona mode voltages begin and end. Much higher than 750v, the CHM11 begins to pick up noise and other unwanted events. No doubt this is a characteristic with the Soviet boron tubes but in the grand scheme of things, its a total non-issue.

Later today I'll try the same experiment with another dusty relic in the shop and report back.

I see this as a potential game changer for newbies or those struggling with neutron detection.

Model 3 plus CHM11 provides solid noise-free neutron detection....$150 and you're off and running!

Mark Rowley
User avatar
Mark Rowley
Posts: 909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:20 am
Real name: Mark Rowley
Location: Sacramento California
Contact:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Mark Rowley »

Just pulled another old Ludlum Model 3 off the shelf, dropped the voltage to 750, hooked up the CHM11, and worked flawlessly.

Just for fun I swapped in the smaller Soviet CHM14 boron tube which worked equally well.

No Fusor noise, full rejection of gamma and xrays on both tubes and Model 3’s.

Shown is a pic of the CHM11/Model 3 with a paraffin moderator containing a weak but detectable Am/Be source.

Mark Rowley
Attachments
DF9EF389-185C-4126-A0C5-B0116DB7DCD5.jpeg
User avatar
Jim Kovalchick
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:00 pm
Real name:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Jim Kovalchick »

Mark,
I'm curious, did you use an in-line resistor or coupling capacitor?
Thanks,
Jim K
User avatar
Mark Rowley
Posts: 909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:20 am
Real name: Mark Rowley
Location: Sacramento California
Contact:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Mark Rowley »

10meg resistor. No cap.

Mark
User avatar
Mark Rowley
Posts: 909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:20 am
Real name: Mark Rowley
Location: Sacramento California
Contact:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Mark Rowley »

Put together a 10 minute vid on the arrangement showing it's simplicity.

https://youtu.be/cCRk45gLEmc

Mark Rowley
Tom Hanley
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2015 9:37 pm
Real name: Tom Hanley
Location: Sydney Australia
Contact:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Tom Hanley »

Just wanted to say, Thanks for the post Mark, helpful info.
I have scrounged up an old Ludlum Model 12 , it needed a cleanup, passes battery test and has a C type jack connector and it did come with a C type original cable. ( model 3's are possibly a better unit)
Electronic shops over here don't have adaptors ( possibly due to the age of it)and a "BNC Female to C Male Ludlum UG-636A/U Coaxial connector adapter" that have seen recently on EBAY cost Australian $43 and $29 postage from the US). it looks as though I might have to hack the terminal to an SHV connector. I have just gotten a CNM-11 tube also and will need to adapt to it too.
But its good to know that someone has already did some hack work, makes things a bit easier for guys like me less experienced.
Regards Tom
User avatar
Mark Rowley
Posts: 909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:20 am
Real name: Mark Rowley
Location: Sacramento California
Contact:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Mark Rowley »

Hi Tom,
Thanks for the comments.
It's nice to see some benefit from the post. Swapping the C to a SHF is easy and I doubt you'll have any problems.
The 12 is a great meter but I cant attest to it's ability to operate in plug-n-play like the Model 3. The 12 has threshold control that may need adjustment for it to work.

Mark Rowley
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14992
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Richard Hull »

I have 5 various Ludlums on hand here and the #1 thing I do once I purchase them is to test them, if OK them #2 is putting a common BNC connector on them. After mounting the common BNC, I put a nice big ole wad of silly-cone HV putty over the inside HV solder connection at the rear of the BNC. Haven't had any issues doing this.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Pablo Llaguno
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 6:00 pm
Real name: Pablo Llaguno

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Pablo Llaguno »

Mark I noticed in your video that you have a "The Nucleus" counter. I also happen to have one and a Nuclear Chicago BF3 tube.
IMG_0009.jpg
IMG_0009.jpg (154.22 KiB) Viewed 11118 times
Since it has adjustable voltage, could I set it up at 750V and start counting nuetrons? I don't have any specs on my tube (and I searched without success) but I can have access to a neutron source. One issue about the tube is it's connector, it is a UG-59A/U coaxial, any ideas on how to fit this to the BNC of the counter?
User avatar
Mark Rowley
Posts: 909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:20 am
Real name: Mark Rowley
Location: Sacramento California
Contact:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Mark Rowley »

Hi Pablo
I’ve never tried it with the Nucleus. Only thing I use it for is to count indium activation results by driving a standard LND 7311 pancake tube. I know those units work good with scintillation type detectors but I can’t attest to their suitability with any neutron detectors. The Nucleus only has a voltage control, nothing else. Internally it’s all solid state with none of the standard calibration controls found on the more common meters like a Ludlum or Eberline. Tbh, I’m very doubtful if it’d work. But nothing is gained without trying. Just remember, the arrangement I suggest has a very narrow set of guidelines. Ludlum Model 3 and either a CHM11 or 14 tube. Beyond that, you’re in uncharted waters.

Only suggestion on the connector is to try to source an adapter or build your own cable.

Mark Rowley
Sarmad suseyn
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun May 03, 2020 1:37 pm
Real name: Sarmad
Location: Kuwait
Contact:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Sarmad suseyn »

Hi Mark Rowley
Thanks too much for your video.
I tried to copy your settings (hopefully no copy right issues 😁)
But without luck.
I have ludlum model 3 and Russian snm-14 tube.
I setup the voltage to 750v and i added 10m ohm resistor to the top part(positive) . And im not getting any readings.
Im using about 120 smoke detector americium (120 μCi)
With berylium chunk as a neutron source. And hdpe blocks as moderator. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
John Futter
Posts: 1848
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 10:29 pm
Real name: John Futter
Contact:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by John Futter »

Sarmad
you have not completed your registration on this site, and you are not following the site rules
your first post must be in the "Please introduce yourself" forum

otherwise you are starting to act troll like
User avatar
Mark Rowley
Posts: 909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:20 am
Real name: Mark Rowley
Location: Sacramento California
Contact:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Mark Rowley »

Hello Sarmad,
I’m doubtful that the regular hardware store variety smoke detector sources (even a bunch) will provide a strong enough neutron source to be readily detected above background.

Couple questions...
1) How did you wire the detector to the Ludlum? The connection points between the cable and the tube should be as short and insulated as possible. No alligator clips or long wires as everything should be a direct connection.

2) Are you registering any background counts? If so, how many counts over 5 and 10 minute intervals?

We recently had one case with a CHM11 where there was some possible internal gas pressure difference in the tube causing issues with the resistor value. The only way it was able to work was the total removal of the external resistor (there’s still an internal 3.3m resistor in the model 3). Even cutting the value of the external resistor in half did not help. Now of course this is a last resort scenario and may not be relevant to your situation.

If you’re getting background counts then it’s just a matter of your neutron source being too weak.

As an important Fyi, it’s a common misconception that all one has to do is attach a few Am241 buttons to a block of beryllium and it’s neutron city. Not the case. You may get a few but the amount will be ultra low and quite often much to low to easily detect with a boron type corona tube including a wide variety of other neutron detectors.

Mark Rowley
User avatar
Jim Kovalchick
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:00 pm
Real name:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Jim Kovalchick »

Mark,
I am testing a CHM 11 with a 10 Mohm in line resistor, 2 foot MHV to BNC cable, BNC to C adapter, to a Ludlum Model 2200 scaler at 750 V.

At a zero threshold there was of course a lot of noise. I raised the threshold just a tad and the noise became quiet. At background, the counts look random and distinct. There are occasional background events of more than one count. All this looks right to me. A strong radium source does not influence the count rate at all.

I expect to do a test with the fusor later, but my question for you is about background. What is the count rate you experience? A 10 minute run yielded 131 counts. 13 cpm seems high to me for a CHM 11.

Update: fusor run complete. The CHM 11 performed very well. It's count rate was 25% higher than my old Nancy Woods BF3 tube in the PNC. Moderator removal test passed with flying colors. No issue with xray interference. This may become my permanently installed indication for my fusor.

Thanks
Jim K
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14992
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Richard Hull »

No experience with the russki tubes. However, my large 3He in water moderator reads 6 cpm on a low day and 12cpm on a bizarre sun day and one time 22 cpm during the great CME some years back where I could see the Aurora here in Richmond. The norm is 7-9 cpm. I think your background is OK. (assuming it is in a moderator).

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Rich Feldman
Posts: 1470
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:59 pm
Real name: Rich Feldman
Location: Santa Clara County, CA, USA

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Rich Feldman »

Here are some more numbers about count rates.
And a question for Mark about the activity in his "weak" AmBe neutron source.

My home-made AmBe source, with roughly 70 uCi of Am, gave a clear signal with a conventional BF3 tube.
About 2 counts per minute, above background of about 1/2 count per minute.
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=12649&p=86307&hili ... ier#p86287

It was my first crude attempt with that source. Next step hasn't happened yet, because I left the detector at work on March 12, and have not set foot there since that day.

It's my understanding that commercial AmBe neutron sources have the relevant elements powdered and mixed together,
so they are naturally a few times more efficient than anything easy to make with separate alpha sources and Be metal.
(Be powder is the natural precursor to all Be in solid shapes for making engineered parts.)
All models are wrong; some models are useful. -- George Box
User avatar
Jim Kovalchick
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:00 pm
Real name:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Jim Kovalchick »

My home lab is about 16 feet above sea level in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. I would have thought that background would be relatively low at this place vs most other places in the country. Also, perhaps this latitude may have less neutron producing cosmic rays.

My detector is surrounded by 2 inches of HDPE on all sides.

I was expecting more like what Richard reported or less.
User avatar
Mark Rowley
Posts: 909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:20 am
Real name: Mark Rowley
Location: Sacramento California
Contact:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Mark Rowley »

Jim
Glad to hear it’s working good for you.
Using the Ludlum 2221, my CHM11 averages about 1cpm. Two 10 separate 10 minute counts yielded 9 and 10 events each.

Rich,
I forgot to update the AmBe remark in the earlier post. Alan and I were discussing static neutron sources a couple months ago and I realized this error. It’s actually a weak PoBe source being a Nuclespot Static Eliminator disc I purchased new around August 2018. It was almost at 17 months of decay when I ran the test last January. Configuration was just the typical Be block placed over the Nuclespot screen.

Mark Rowley
User avatar
Jim Kovalchick
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:00 pm
Real name:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Jim Kovalchick »

Thanks Mark. I tried a couple iterations of threshold adjustments and found that another tenth of a ten-turn got my background down to 1 to 2 cpm. Because there is no preamp, I'm afraid to move the threshold to far. A proportional tube dip will be too small to see otherwise I think. Fusor run later to test with known neutrons.
User avatar
Jim Kovalchick
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:00 pm
Real name:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Jim Kovalchick »

My Ludlum 2200 threshold is set at 0.8 on the ten-turn, and voltage is 750. Background is around 1 cpm.

Today I packed the CHM 11 into a piece of 4 inch poly drain pipe with HDPE granules. Parked up next to my fusor running at -37.5 kV and 8 mA, the detector read 2000 cpm on the rate meter. I think with some adjustments to geometry it could improve, but at this point I really just need to set a consistent benchmark that i can use as a gauge of fusor performance.

These Soviet tubes seem to be immune to xrays when set up the way Mark advises. Performance, cost, and size make these tubes an easy choice for permanent fusor neutron detection.
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14992
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Richard Hull »

I am glad to here you have it working. Good going. The higher a neutron count you can get versus background, the better. (more efficient neutron detection) This allows for detecting very small neutron counts from very weak neutron sources as well as small differentials in small, weak sources.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Jim Kovalchick
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:00 pm
Real name:

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Jim Kovalchick »

Richard,
I doubt the CHM 11 tubes will be very useful for low neutron counts. Maybe I will try some low voltage, low current ops to find out. I'm not real keen on running my fusor too low voltages because with deuterium the pressure is hard on the turbo. I may just shut it off.

I was really thinking of using the CHM 11 tube as more of a 'speedometer' if you will. I will permanently affix it to the fusor such that at the high end I will have a measure of performance and benchmark for experiments like activation.

For much lower neutron counts I intend to use my lithium 6 paddle. That detector was intended to rival a whole bank of He 3 tubes. I have yet to fully explore it's full capabilities. I think it may even be able to pick up low count rate alpha-n reactions from non-fusor experiments I'm interested in doing. For fusor work I found that it's size made it a little impractical and more importantly, it was very sensitive to pile up of the numerous xrays even when I shielded.

Jim K
Marko Kuzmanovic
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2021 6:02 pm
Real name: Marko Kuzmanovic
Location: Auckland

Re: Easy $150 Neutron Detection System

Post by Marko Kuzmanovic »

Mark Rowley wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2020 10:23 pm Put together a 10 minute vid on the arrangement showing it's simplicity.

https://youtu.be/cCRk45gLEmc

Mark Rowley

It shows the video as private?
Post Reply

Return to “Neutrons, Radiation, and Detection (& FAQs)”